Is dlss worth it for 1440p Still it was meant for 8k. I don't need ray tracing, and I want the CPU to not bottleneck my GPU. DLSS in some games is absolutely fantastic, and I thoroughly enjoyed Metro Exodus with it. Do you enjoy playing at 4K ultra performance? Is the extra boost in pixel count worth the artifacts that dlss sometimes causes? The 1440p data is much more favorable for the RTX 3050, when compared to AMD's recently released 6500 XT. At 1440p that goes below 1080p even at quality mode. r/digitalfoundry. Watch some benchmarks and go with your gut and wallet Dlss quality can look better in some games if implemented well. 1440p resolution requires less GPU grunt to render, Still, DLSS 3 is impressive technology and well worth using in most games. I mainly use it for watching videos, coding and gaming from time to time. i am playing single player game like Assassin creed, cyberpunk, red dead 2 and old games without multiplayer. But at the end of the day, it’s all about how good it looks TO YOU. Does DLSS affect aim? I made a The key innovation of DLSS is rendering games at a lower target resolution, then using AI to upscale and reconstruct the final image to your monitor‘s native resolution. Q&A [deleted] Support us on Patreon: https://www. It makes it run way colder and the artifacts aren’t too visually intrusive. All it really needs is something better than SMAA. I get a solid 20-30% FPS boost AND everything looks a little smoother. tldr yeah go with the high res monitor. DLSS 3 still new thing for me and keep seeing people say its better native, and the tech still bad. Honestly if you're going for 1440p for newer games the 3060 even with DLSS is going to struggle a little bit. It looks and performs best if you’re outputting at 1440p or 4K, and the benefits diminish at a lower DLSS upscales the result to 4K. DLSS was created to be used for 4k gaming. At 1440p, it is fine. Is it worth using DLSS at 1440p? dlss works with 1440p, but it’s not necessarily better. Reply reply Ultra + Psycho Raytracing + DLSS Balanced at 1440p Patch 2. Get a 1440p 240hz monitor - lots of budget options available now. 78x + dlss gives you really good antialiasing without killing frame rates. They are both rendering the game at ~1280x720 internal resolution. 78x and 1440p DLSS Performance in a game; it will likely look much better DLSS combined with DLDSR runs worse than DLAA but looks better*. Digital Foundry DLSS 3 and frame generation are 100% worth iton anything but the 4070. I don´t think the difference is that noticeable when playing on a TV at larger viewing distances when compared to a monitor but I do notice an improved overall sharpness You can't physically see 1440p worth of pixels, due to there not being any. DLSS was specifically designed to make RT viable at higher resolutions. 25x DLSS Performance - 91FPS I use a 3080, and for what it's worth it wouldn't matter if I was using an AMD card because what I use has no effect on what DLSS/DLAA/whatever else It’s worth giving 1800p a shot if you ever need to! Also, a lot of these games could be optimized further for my displays but I prefer to keep the same settings at 4K & 1440p, aside from changing the DLSS quality level or enabling FG. The only issue is with frame generation and ray reconstruction, the two of them cause some ghosting. Controversial. At 1440p DLSS Quality is close to a no brainer in most games and DLSS Balanced is usable in some sorry for my poor English language. 25x DLSS Quality (1440p -> 4k) - 68fps DLDSR 2. All I’m saying is my machine isn’t so top tier that DLSS doesn’t help. I wouldn't recommend it. 6700XT is not really better, they are pretty even at 1440p. Reply reply Odd-Difficulty This. If you have 1440p i think you can get 10 fps comfortably, thats my take. Depending on what resolution you’re running the game at, this If your framerate is still to low, try DLSS Balanced mode, that downscales the image further. Reply reply promina100 • At 1080p DLSS isn't worth it, it's best on a 4k panel. Reply reply GodOfTheSky • DLSS in tarkov doesn't work well. At 2160p + DLSS performance (downscaling to 1440p) the game looks crisp and the resolution scaling to me is unnoticeable. Ray tracing is OK but I turned it to medium because it seemed like high RT made the environment too shiny and reflecty, as though they'd overdone it out of excitement. I assume you have a 1080p display? Set your games to 1080p DLSS/quality. DLSS, XeSS, and FSR technology were all mainly intended for 4k and higher to reduce rendering stress loads on the GPUs. I budgeted $1100 for the 4080 super but got tired of waiting and grabbed a 4070S Founders Edition at Best Buy. 1080p DLSS - 540p 1440p - 720p 2160p - 1080p The optimized DLSS settings are Quality for 1080p, Balanced for 1440p, and Performance for 4K. i recently bought Asus TUF A15 2023 (Ryzen 7 7735HS + RTX 4060 + 16 GB DDR5 4800 RAM) and i am planning to buy the monitor MSI MAG 27CQ6F (2560 X 1440 (WQHD + 180HZ). DLSS also tends to screw up post DLSS quality at 4K renders at 1440p and then upscales. It sees an average of 15 to 20 fps improvement (if the game isn't already running at max, and the 3080ti is certainly capable) For example, in Control, without DLSS and max detail, max Ray tracing, the 3080ti gets an average of 65 to 90 fps. Edit: I just tested it in Witcher 3 v4. The game is an unoptimized buggy disaster. If performance is good and smooth you are good. I've run over the past 8 years: 560ti Sometimes I can’t tell if the raytracing is worth it. So if you have a 4k monitor and you're making a 4k image out of a 1440p or even 1080p image, there's already a lot of detail for the card to work with and extrapolate accurate data from. permalink; embed; save; report; reply [deleted] 3 points 4 points 5 I'm not very educated on dlss so please forgive my ignorance. That being said, you’ll likely be fine as is given Blizzard’s optimization history. Once DLSS got the 2. And if the performance hit will be identical to the one experienced while scaling. is this monitor worth to buying? for the FPS, Fuck RT reflections, no GPUs are powerful enough for it to be worth the grainy look and performance hit, RT lighting gets me solid as a rock though. For 1440p it can be good on some games, but worse in others. Not worth just for the dlss. And in a lot of cases DLSS quality looks better than native. Dlss actually renders below 1080p and fills in the gaps and often times looks even better than native 1440p which is something I don’t understand fully. is worth it depending on the games you play. When displaying at 1080p DLSS upscales to 1440p in quality mode. It's different than using classic DSR and enabling DLSS in game. . most games will look much better with it, and the few that are too intense to run ultra natively can be upscaled very well nowadays, or just played with high or medium settings. Use dlss if you need to reach higher fps to cap. 5) and 4x (2x2)being the best. it’s only better if you need it for the fps boost. Reply reply Merdiso • • Edited . I have the 4070 Super and love it. 1080p dlss will almost always look like shit, 1440p it could be great depending on your screen size (here 1440p @ 27" works great) and in 4k it will almost certainly work really well. A few video options you can lower with very minimal visual hit and gain a few % performance. DLSS "Balanced" is two tiers down, so if you are playing at 4k then the game is rendering at 1080p and being upscaled to 4k. (Although, you can use DLDSR and DLSS simultaneously. I seem to get better fps at 1080p, and its also a higher resolution, so wouldnt it be better to just lower native resolution? Example 1440p dlss Q is 1080p but for 1440p+ (DLDSR 2. Paying $599 for a 70-class graphics card explicitly marketed for 1440p gaming deeply Tbh the games worth getting 4K+Full RT for, are all single player games that you really don't need more than 90fps to enjoy. 4K with DLSS Quality feels like a large step up in clarity from 1440p no DLSS and the added screen real estate is wonderful. Particularly rock textures (which is a large portion of what you're RTX 4060’s native performance in 1080p and 1440p at max settings . 1440p worth it? Hey_Jude. floatplane. Maxed out settings, GPU usage only at 55%, and a consistent 120fps. Acutally 4k dlss Performance even Looks better than 1440p native. The aliasing on this massive screen is just unacceptable. I tested scaling to 1440p on the external monitor and get around 50-55 fps on the same settings with DLSS balanced as well as 60-65 fps at DLSS performance. Other new titles are at ultra maxed with DLSS. 25X) + dlss q it is 1440p with output target of 4K and then downscaled by gou later to fit properly on ur screen. But since you are on a 3060, FG is off the table. Here is a comparison between 1080p DLAA, 1440p DLSS Quality and 4K DLSS Performance even though 1080p DLAA is rendering at 1080p, and 1440p DLAA Quality is Dlss really shines at 1440p and above. At 1080p just mess with settings until your FPS matches your refresh rate of your panel. 1440p resolution requires less GPU grunt to render, so the game’s framerate improves. Honestly at 1080p, you might be better off just dropping graphical settings and sticking with native resolution rendering if you're having performance problems rather than using DLSS. 0 As mentioned, DLSS Super Resolution works best at a high output resolution. But sometimes, like when talking to the lady at the desk, I'd get flickering across some items in the background that native 1440p didn't have. Seems very easy to turn on and off, so it might be worth setting up just to use for sniping. 0 the only way to use Ray Reconstruction is to use DLSS, so yes, use DLSS Quality at least (or lower if you need more performance and don't mind quality drop). Were as Native 4k is even difficult for a 3080 to push 60fps in games like cyberpunk maxed out unless using dlss I play on 1440p/144hz. on another note, how does dlss/fsr q look on 1440p? better than native 1080p? how does 720p mode look? is it better since 1440p=4x 720p or it looks just as shit as it looks on 1080p? (720p mode is q on 1080p) There obviously comes a point when the degradation on quality does not warrant the extra frames, but at least at 1440p quality -> balance is worth it if you are struggling to keep consistently high FPS Reply reply if thats too demanding try 1. 78x dlss ultra performance and 1440p dlss performance, but theres a DLSS is also a thing, if you want high settings and high resolution. Most games I’ll use DLSS if possible and then lower the render resolution to around 90% of 1440p (if I’m going for high frame rate) if you’re looking for visual quality, just lower the settings a bit as unscaled will always be sharper than upscaled. patreon. 2. When Turing launched even the 2080Ti was struggling to get 60fps at 1080p when enabling ray tracing. You want your Like the title suggests, I want to game at 1440p 144hz as for a fairly cheap price in 2024. Otherwise, try DLSS quality and judge whether the performance boost is worth the visual changes. Ray Tracing is not worth it. If yes, take it another step down to Balanced and do the same. Best. comments. The DLSS AI model then enhances and upscales that lower resolution render to full 1440p sharpness. With these I was able to play Cyberpunk 2077 at max graphics settings (except for RT) at 40-75 FPS on 1440p with DLSS balanced on, where had i not, i would be at < 30 fps. It's such a good way to perform Anti-Aliasing. I average 72 fps with minimum fps dropping to 64. With RT it’s around 115-120 fps. With 1440p you can set DLSS Quality and you've more comfortable "fps". There're pros and cons to it, like for example DLSS in quality mode(!) fixes a lot of the flickering TAA causes, plus gives you a nice little FPS boost, however the image does get somewhat blurrier (try taking screenshots with and without and checking them outside of the game) and it makes the map Worth the dip in fps imo for this particular game. Skyyblaze; Member; 258 3 Posted 1 hour ago. even worse when moving the mouse around. Visual clarity, especially at distance, seems significantly better in the video, so that could be really beneficial It depends on the size of your monitor and the resolution too. It's really not worth it to run everything at 1440p unless you are using dlss. Most of the time yeah, DLSS won hands own. DLDSR is a newer addition to DSR, selectable in Nvidia Control Panel. My problem is that I do not really know how that would look with an actual 1440p monitor. Top. DLSS Performance mode is a last-resort, it downscales the image MASSIVELY, which results in the worst visuals of the DLSS options, but it is still a decent way to play the latest games at 1440p on a weaker card like an RTX 2060. 78 dsr to make my game 1440p then dlss up from 1080 and it looks more crisp than infinite aa ever could. If you have the headroom or find it not good enough, then I With my 1440p monitor anything under DLSS Quality looks bad. Remember you are rendering the game to 1440p in the PC first instead of the 1080 so it comes Upscaling can of course help at 1440p as well, so if you enable DLSS — or FSR 2/3 on AMD GPUs — you can typically boost performance by 30–50 percent without too much of a loss in image fidelity. I would go native res and use whatever dlss you need to get performance you desire. I don't see why people claim 4k DLSS performance looks better than native 1440p. com/hardwareunboxedJoin us on Floatplane: https://www. Dlss nowadays is so good you can barely keep It apart with native 4k in many Games. 0 seems I don't use DLSS 3, it's kind of irrelevant for an online gamer, but DLSS 2 is worth it alone Reply reply As someone who currently games on a single 24" 1080p monitor, with zero intention of upgrading to 1440p, yeah, I'd say it's probably worth it. ) But otherwise, yes. 0 Win11 A screenshot doesn´t show the problem really, I can upload a video tomorrow. its a perfectly good 1080 card but 1440 is a lot to ask for a mid grade card. It does push over 7gb of vram in a lot of games, but if a 3060 ti can handle that resolution, a 3070 should The 1440p DLSS performance will be more detailed and sharper when you're stationary, but could fall apart more when there's fast motion. Visuals for the ultra preset in the vast majority of games is not worth the fps hit at all. Reply reply LastOffender • • Darktide is a recent example where it looks significantly better with DLSS on Quality to native 1440p +TAA. DLSS fixed When we tested DLSS across 26 titles at 4K and 1440p, we observed that DLSS often produced better or similar image quality to native this made DLSS worth using as its Just looks horrible. I bounce between a combo of . FSR2 and Intel XeSS both work 2560x1440 native gives better performance than DLSS "4k" and I would prefer the frames, yes. Where as 1440p and 4K are demanding enough that getting extra performance is nice. In this video I play 17 popular games on the new RTX 4070 12GB at 1440p resolution (with and without DLSS 3 / Ray Tracing), and share with you my real time g I have a 4070 as well but I play on a 32 inch 1440p screen. As mentioned, DLSS Super Resolution works best at a high output resolution. There is an issue trying to use DSR and DLSS at the same time with this game, at least when I tried it. For example, your monitor may be 1440p, but with DLSS the game itself renders internally at 1080p or lower. Bigger difference than I was expecting. Imo 1440p is worth it. This gives you significantly higher FPS than rendering natively at 1440p, while the AI keeps the overall visual quality high. 25x DLDSR (4K for 1440p) with DLSS Quality it will keep the rendering cost at 1440p since that will be the DLSS resolution, not to mention it will also provide additional anti-aliasing benefits offered by DLSS (and thats on Im thinking of upgrading to 4070 ti , i mostly game on 1440p , everyone is saying that dlss 3 is such a huge upgrade and even if the card is expensive its still worth it went from 1080ti to 3080 FE at 1440p 144hz 2 years ago, was worth it. For me, Frame Generation alone makes it worth it, no way to run the game with an ENB above 200 fps at 3440x1440 without DLSS 3. Dlss/fsr can help a lot if supported. 25 (1. In the 1440p case render scaling gave you better gains, in the 1080p case it came out about equal. DLSS is wizardry, turn it on and run games at their maximum settings on 1080p and run them In CP2077 at 1440p + DLSS quality the game looks in my opinion quite blurry and muddy and the resolution scaling is very visible especially in objects/structures in the distance. Prices in my countly a litle strange for it and I don't know lot about AMD card, so I want to ask for your help to choose which one is worth it. Saving more money or waiting for a sale makes 100% sense. 240hz is competitive gaming refresh rates, and so I don't think it's fair to say the 4090 struggles. This is a comparison of DLSS vs render scaling. Enabling DLSS without RT effects can be of big help, Exactly. Let's hope that Rockstar or Nvidia will release an update that makes dlss better. Old. It plays well for me. 1440p 165hz to 1080p 240hz isn't worth it unless you REALLY care about competitive titles and, more importantly, you think the 75hz difference is bottlenecking your ability (it probably isn't). It was very blurry otherwise. I wouldn't invest any penny in 1080p in 2023, the first upgrade should be a 1440p/4K monitor and perhaps use DLSS, especially if you don't have At 1080p, Quality mode typically renders the game at 1440p before downscaling, Balanced mode matches the native display resolution, and Performance mode starts as low "is dlss equal/better than native" is a meaningful inflection point more as a rhetorical point for NVIDIA to break down the inherent bias that a lot of intransigent reviewers and enthusiasts seem to have against DLSS - if there's Overall DLSS is amazing at 1440p. DLSS quality at 1080p renders at a much lower resolution, I think it's something like 768p, and the results are not nearly as good. com/channel/HardwareUnboxedBuy relevant So if you are playing at 4k with DLSS Quality then it is rendering the game at 1440p and upscaling to 4k. 25x DLSS Balanced (~1280p -> 4k ) 78fps DLDSR 2. I have two 27 inch displays (4k and 1440p). I have an i9-9900k, 16GB, 2070 Super. And don't even see any real performance hit. 0 came out, not many people were on board. Can’t complain, and with DLSS hopefully coming in 1-2 weeks I’m excited to gain some performance and maximize my frames since I have a 144hz screen. So I'll use for example 1. try using DLDSR 1. 25x - No DLSS - 4k render - 47fps DLDSR 2. More traditional super-resolution techniques can lead to artifacts and bugs in the eventual In my opinion Control on 1440p monitor with DLSS on looks terrible. I´m in the same boat but with a 4070 (very similar performance). 24 inch 1440p monitor worth it? What I do is combine dlss with dsr. If you find that the uplift from the 4070 Super to 4070 Ti Super looks good, it will be even better At 1440p I guess if you are using a low tier rtx card then yes. Is it worth getting a 1440p monitor for a 3050TI GPU? Build Help Hey, I'm buying a new monitor to use alongside my laptop. 1 and in the exact same spot, DLSS Quality gave me 40 FPS while native 1440p with TAAU gave me 48 FPS. I'm currently using a 1440p monitor with a 4070 ti. NMS is one of them, the other is ETS2 which doesn't have DLSS. IF it´s the right product to keep you 5 years happy, thats a So for a real life example: I am now playing Cyberpunk 2077 at DLSSR 1440p with DLSS balanced. On 4K you get most of the time a better image because superb AA and more pixels DLSS quality in 1080p is not great. Considering the value for money at I've used DLSS at 1080p, and its definitely worth it especially if you want to do ray tracing. It is actually viable to Play Like this even with my 3060ti. (But that heavily depends on the taa implementation of the game) DLSS will probably also have more ghosting artifacts, but again that varies from game to game. Reply reply Is DLSS worth it? Question Those of you who are on 1440p monitors, is does dlss “quality” make the game look bad? I’ve read comments about how it doesn’t look good in this game. It's not the same in all games, but overall for a 1440p monitor it's 1080p is 77% scale of 1440p and dlss can go as low as 33% right but then you get wierd artifacts and stuff (at least when i played metro and dying light 2). 0. Yeah i only want play D4 at best setting possible in 1440p. They're exponential. At 1080p it's more hit and miss, some games looks In some games, DLSS Quality is considered better than native resolution as it reduces the softening effect of other Anti-Aliasing solutions. Still significantly cheaper than full on super sampling though *When internal res is native. After spending sn eternity debating on a 4070 super or 4080 super, here are my thoughts. imo its not worth to go 1440p unless you need or want 27” and more 24”monitor is perfect size for me and its mostly just This being said, since then DLSS has improved and if you also combine it with a smaller monitor, maybe a 24" one, it probably is a way better experience today in newer games. With that said I don't see the 3080 or 4070 keeping a stable 4K60 in AAA games DLSS is great at whatever resolution. (on an OC’d 2060 super) when DLSS 1. I know 6950xt has better overall performance and wondering if NVIDIAs features are worth it, something else to note is I'll be playing with 750w psu at least for a while no matter the gpu and I saw AMD's recommendation of 850w for the 6950xt. Also, downscaling should be used with whole integers- 2. DLSS 2. Nah. I'm a big fan of taking the PS5 and Xbox Series X quality mode settings and maxing out the textures if they're already not, and adding ray tracing. The DLSS quality with native 1440p renders in 960p. I play on ultra RT with path tracing, dlss quality, dlss ray reconstruction and dlss frame generation. 4k performance mode is 1080p which is acceptable for most people. Be aware of the latency issues with frame gen. The Quality preset technically renders a lesser resolution, but the AA filtering used looks so good, it generally is accepted as good or even better than native. First up is the various RT Lighting settings. But yea ill go with 4070. At 1080p it was mostly mediocre but at 1440p some games look even better with DLSS quality than native. It might not even be in the games you play and/or you may not need it to hit your desired It's pretty noticeable, sure, but 4k tanks your fps much harder than going 1440p from 1080p. Theoretically, with my new monitor at native 1440p and same dlss setting I should get higher framerate, yes? My gpu is 3080. Open comment sort options. He is comparing a 4070 Super vs a 4070 Ti Super at 1440p with DLSS and all other configuration. Dlss is worth it, if it accelerates fps. I play on 1440p. The MSI RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Gaming X Slim is a solid graphics card aimed at 1440p gaming, with decent legs at 4K. DLSS Quality is amazing for 1440p gaming IMO. Go as low as you think it's worth. It's a balancing act, but I'd say using Path Tracing with native resolution produces somewhat Some ppl said DLSS worth if you're on high res (1440p and 4k) It definitely works better the higher you go. TAA looks fine in the 4k monitor (although DLSS quality looks better), but TAA looks terrible in the 1440p monitor, I had to push the scaling up to 1. It looks and performs best if you’re outputting at 1440p or 4K, and the benefits diminish at a lower I am playing Control at 1440p DLSS and switched back and forth to compare. DLSS made it so people with 1440p or 4K displays could upscale the image to balance quality and performance. Running on 3080ti. There’s some games where it isn’t implemented particularly well, and others where it doesn’t make much of a difference. However, it’s important to understand that DLSS uses neural rendering to Only if you play at 4k and some instances 1440p is dlss worth it visually. Reply reply I use a 3060 ti at 1440p ultrawide (3440x1440), and with DLSS in most games it runs absolutely fine. Or does it just not matter either way at that point? For context, I'm using a 4090 playing at 1440p. 25x DLDSR on a 1440p monitor renders internally at 4k, then downscales back to 1440p. However, with DLSS now available, is it worth getting a 1440p, or 4K is a viable option? Also, I was kind of wanting to be able to use RTX. 4070ti is 20-25% faster in that resolution compared to my 3080, so I´d say worth it. For example, on a 1440p monitor using DLDSR to output at 2160p, That's the same like 1080p quality mode or 1440p performance mode. fps to match it. DLSS is amazing at 1440p and FSR 2. Sometimes 70. Is it worth it to use the DLSS 3 for games if I'm maxing them out with a native resolution and high fps? The refreh rate is 165hz and as I said I have no problem hitting 120+ fps in most titles. The most important thing is that YOU should be happy and satisfied with the choice, not how others feel. New Yes it works when you enable RR, but I don't think it's worth it. I've actually found that in a good amount of situations DLSS quality mode actually improves both performance and image quality. Could be a fluke, and I'll take the extra frame rate any day of the week, but that was my experience. 1080p and 1440p do NOT need DLSS. DLSS performance is a massive downgrade Vs native quality at any resolution, I know we're all high on DLSS here, but people need to have some common sense, or try things out for themselves. 78X DLDSR + DLAA at 1440p and it looks pretty phenomenal Reply reply It will look slightly better than native 1440p, but it is not worth the loss of performance if you're just rendering the game at native 4K then DLSS was just added to Warzone with Season 3! In this video I'll be testing all the DLSS settings at 1440p & 1080p! We'll also be testing the difference in f DLSS ONLY working when you use your native resolution. Otherwise don't use it Reply reply A 6900xt at 1440p beats a 3090 in more games than it loses, Yes with DLSS you get more Performance but thats because it's not true 1440p, I would much rather have have 10% less performance and have true 1440p than 1273p upscaled, There isn't a game it can't run at 1440p. well I have the sapphire nitro+ SE 6900XT and it's amazing at 1440p. Cheers Reply reply better is to use DSR or create Custom resolution of 1440p and then use DLSS, for example in control you can play at 1440p DLSS from 720p with full ray tracing at 60-80FPS easily, 1080p will net you same performance but it will look over sharpened and blurry, and it was with 1080p 144Hz monitor. Anyone telling you otherwise is either shilling for the company like a parrot, or has no idea what they're talking about. I can't speak for everyone but IMO 10% for an Nvidia card is totally worth it. CPU is 125w 13600k The DLSS version is outdated and badly tuned so you can't run upscaled 1440p like in many other games either (if your CPU is even good enough for this to matter). "fps" meaning with FG enabled is a completely different thing that actual fps in term of DLSS upscales the result to 4K. I get like 80-90 frames. Reply reply BendInevitable9594 • Imma buy an rx7700xt in a few months. Most games I’ve tried Nvidia is making some pretty bold claims around DLSS 3, like the ability to 3x-4x performance with RTX 40 GPUs. Performance would be better in 1080p but I run 1440p and it helps a lot with long range spotting. Reply reply 1440p with dlss is way better than 1080p with quality. People said it would look horrible running games at A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. DLSS beats FSR every time as well (read TechSpots recent comparison) and DLSS can be a lifesaver in demanding games eventually. Is there any performance gain for 1440p resolutions? Share Add a Comment. With DLSS quality and a mixture of ultra/high. For 1080p, is totally not worth it. Even then I think I will still use DLDSR partnered with DLSS once on 4k. We also saw from the previous Fortnite test that the game seemed to have slight input lag The person above is correct but keep in mind that you can combine DLSS with DSR. For example i have a 4k monitor, when using DLSS i have to change game Resolution to 4k and can activate DLSS (if the game has support for it) and then it downscales the image to 1440p or even lower, depends on the settings of DLSS. 4070 had 12gb of ram, is the 8 a laptop thing? anyway my 2080 8gb with dlss at 1440p did great, you should have no problem. It will definitely look better than native on RDR2 at the tradeoff for hair looking worse, but using DSR and DLSS together can beat that. 78x DL) or 7680x4320 (4x DSR) any other DSR resolutions I Nvidia's DLSS is FINALLY here in Tarkov but with heaps of people unsure what it is or how it works let's dive into some side by side comparisons & ask is it For example with a 5900x and 3080 at 1440p, can run tarkov at 3400x1920p with DLSS on Quality and still have over 100 fps maybe losing 10-15 frames depending on hardware. Hey all, Pretty much as the title says- looking for some opinions and insight on how people are liking ray tracing on the 4070 at 1440p. I'm thinking about shelling out more cash for a 1440p 144hz monitor but I'm not sure if it's worth it considering I have a 3050TI GPU? I'm just kinda worried if this monitor and GPU combo will While I'm a little uncertain, and will probably end up in the settings soon again, I think the combination of 1440p as a resolution for DLSS, the games current optimization and being CPU bound just makes it so that I can't quite reach the sweet-spot for image quality and FPS to make it worth it (I also noticed that DLSS introduces some ghosting Only games with awful anti aliasing and abysmal performance were worth running with DLSS on, but it still sucks. there isnt a massive performance difference between 1. I use a 4k monitor and it seemed to only work on 5120x2880 (1. Essentially the more pixels you have the better it works so scaling up from 720p will look worse then just running at 1080p for minimal FPS gain. Also the game is unplayable without DLSS pretty much so lucky us I guess. you need to go to 5k and then come back to 1440p via I'll comment on RT/resolution scale as that's where the more immediate difference can be noticed aside from how blurry 1440p vs any DLSS 4K setting is. I use dsr often too, but because not exactly much screens above 4k. 25x if I wanted it to look somewhat decent on my 1440p monitor. Losing frame generation and DLSS 3 isn't worth it I have a 4070 and it feels overkill at 1440p to me, as I have everything maxed out with room to grow. For example, the difference in stability between native 4K and native 1440p in the forest area is very obvious – native 1440p is a large downgrade, while DLSS 1440p Quality I am planning to get a GPU an a 27" monitor. Sort by: Best. As mentioned on the previous page, the RTX 4070 Ti Super makes the most sense to us as a 1440p gaming solution — which is a close stand-in for 4K with DLSS Quality mode upscaling. Or if you start to get CPU bottlenecked, take the DLSS quality setting higher until you're no longer bottlenecked. If you plan to play very casual then dlss is a way to get free fps, but if you play high pop vanilla servers its better to turn it off to have the most visiblity/least input lagg even tho you have less fps it will feel better. Does DLSS make 4K look better? DLSS 2. This GPU offers a slimline design, making it easy to slip into a small form factor case without any issues, and the triple-fan design ensures temperatures remain cool under load. 1440p is By combining 2. Reply reply As someone who is gaming at 1440p with a 2080 Super (should be comparable to a 3060Ti) i can tell you its worth it 1440p is so much cleaner, you just have to live with not being able to play at max settings or The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is an excellent graphics card for 1080p and 1440p with some good entry-level performance in 4K if you can smartly utilize DLSS 3 Frame Generation. Keeping it simple; RT 4K DLSS Quality will probably perform very slightly worse due to DLSS overhead but the exact magnitude of the difference probably varies on a game-by-game basis. 5 x1. A 3080 should be able to handle any competitive title at 240 fps 1440p. For I was just reading up on DLSS and it seems like it would be ideal to run ray tracing with DLSS turned off as long as my rig can provide decent FPS. DLSS was made for 1440p and 4K, it might look already at 1080p. If you have a 1080p screen and you're trying to pull that from a 720 or even 480p image, In this video I play 18 popular games on the new RTX 4070 TI SUPER 16GB at 1440p resolution (with and without DLSS 3 / Ray Tracing), and share with you my re Seconding this, same setup (1440p w/ 3070). Check out digital foundries optimized settings video. If you are willing to compromise on some settings (shadows, dynamic fog, water quality, etc) you can get by fine with a 3060ti but if you insist on using the ultra preset, 3060ti will not be good enough. That doesn't stop everyone from saying to just buy the 4070ti though. Control and Cyberpunk with RT and DLSS on. The RTX 4070 may be worth considering but it’s not a slam-dunk recommendation. It doesn't at all. DLSS Quality at 1440p would be better than DLSS Quality at 1080p though, as that would be ~960p vs ~720p. I just sold my 3080ti to my brother for $500, so speaking from experience. Share Sort by: Best. At 1080p most games I used (war thunder+cyberpunk+atomic hearts) had incredible blur filter like I was looking at a foggy window. Nothing nvidia is worth it rn if you got a 30 series looking for a generation upgrade. Might be worth testing it out to see if you can get a smoother run out of Cyberpunk. I got a 1080p monitor but it's image was bas even 6 years ago (xl2411p). I use DLDSR with dlss but I'm on a 1440p UW for now, it helps with the bottleneck issues. It looks way worse than a cheap 1440p monitor would other than the contrast. Today's flagship GPUs still struggle with 4K Ultra gaming, hardly offering a no You will NOT have the same performance at 1440p with DLSS that you have a 1080 with out. Imo DLSS Quality is usable, but not a "no brainer" in all games at 1080p. u/The_Zura said in his comment that the optimised DLSS setting for 1440p is Balanced. I think it’s worth it, looks beautiful. Going to try balanced tomorrow and see how it Only you can decide if its worth it for you. Or you can enable DLSS, which renders at lower resolution (more FPS) and upscales to native 4K. I’m currently testing DLSS Balance with Frame Is it worth using DLSS at 1440p? dlss works with 1440p, but it’s not necessarily better. I am running a 27", 1440P, For example, the difference in stability between native 4K and native 1440p in the forest area is very obvious – native 1440p is a large downgrade, while DLSS 1440p Quality For example, it downscales 1440p to 1080p and then fills in all of the missing pixels to produce an image nearly identical from the original resolution. And that's mostly going to happen at 1440p or 4K with people that have DLSS capable hardware. DLSS starts to look fine from 4k perf mode, 1440p balanced and 1080p quality. and then in some games with dldsr to 1. If you have a LOT of fps Played tonight with digital foundry rt optimized settings, 1440p dlss quality and it was pretty solid, but kind of all over the place sometimes 120, 70s, 90s, pretty random. At 1440p, the output is closer to the native, non-upscaled image than it is at Stock 1440p no DLSS/DSR - 85fps DLDSR 2. In Cyberpunk 2077 version 2. Get a 1440p monitor or try to find a new video card. It's better to just turn down some settings and it will give you more performance and better visuals than turning DLSS on. For example COD Cold War. For example you can have a 1440p render resolution and upscale to 4K with DLSS, then have DSR downsample it to 1440p again. The difference in picture quality is pretty noticeable, I just don't feel like getting stuck in a faster GPU upgrade cycle than I am currently in. The quality retention gains aren't linear. but we briefly tested at 1080p and 1440p and found all the Thanks for the long reply, I appreciate it! But a 4k native monitor is not looking very well if I set the res of the game to 1440p, no? This is definitely true for text, but much less noticeable in a fast moving game. stupid decision going with AMD because Nvidia's encoding shits on AMD and then the new rtx broadcast features are worth hundreds of dollars of dedicated hardware and we're only in the extremely early days of that. I guess when I think about it im not so focused on distant objects being 'super sampled' im more focused on playing the game rather than it being a visually masturbatory experience for me and for me 4k is a good example of diminishing returns the performance needed to run it is silly Red Dead Redemption 2 has finally launched its DLSS update! I've been very excited to explore DLSS image quality and framerate comparisons in RDR2. The 4080 is better at 1440p than the 3080ti, by 35%. At 1440p, you would likely be limited by your GPU, so DLSS could be a decent uplift, if you are aiming for 60 fps, then it would be worth it, IMO. I was originally aiming for a 3070ti an a 1440p monitor just for higher frame rates. Honestly if you value DLSS 3 and RT performance as well as a 1440p capable card, I'd suggest trying to snag one of those price reduced 4070. Ive had to play at slightly lower settings or drop the res to 1440p in some games but it’s worth it. You lose some FPS and get the oil painting look and npc ghosting. I’ve watched benchmarks and things so I know roughly what the numbers are, but with DLSS 2 and DLDSR 2. Then again, DLSS kind of works against that. DLSS at 4K works well because you are using 1440p as the base image (921,600 pixels vs 3,686,400 pixels). It's gonna be different for everyone, see if it fits your taste or not. Plus 3090ti it is not enough for 1440p ULTRA settings without dlss and RTX on stop saying that 4090 is overkill for 1440p that is not true Reply reply I have a 49" odyssey monitor and hitting 240 in some 1440p games is absolutely worth it to me. Can’t even begin to imagine how it looks on an actual 2160p display Summary. Is DLSS 3 worth it (1080p maybe 1440p) Build - Help Upgrading gpu and stuck between 6950xt or 4070 for 50-75USD more. I play on 1440p and it’s not worth running DLSS. 4k 240hz is sooo nice. there was just a hardware unboxed video around this. I know this might come off as very reactionary but I thought I would ask anyhow. not like he would run it without upscaling, right. I think the problem is people think 1080p is so baseline that it doesn't need any help. DLSS is an image upscaler. Are the Nvidia features like DLSS worth it, or should I just get an AMD card? If so, which one? I think currently, the 4070 is a good card for 1440p gaming right? Running a 3060 TI and a i5-12400 running 1440p at medium settings DLSS is definitely worth it. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. That being said, again, competition is so important or we can have a situation like we did with Intel pre-ryzen DLSS makes rust look blurry, especially long range you might not see alot of players especially if they use camo sets. Does DLSS affect aim? I made a comparison showing off how much aim is affected using the different settings of DLSS with the Sniper Scope and the Holo Sight. DLSS can also improve image Then if im playing at 1440p, with dlss quality, it renders at 1712x960 (according to the last of us meter, released today). And no, DLSS and RTRT are NOT worth upgrading for if you don't necessarily need them. This vide Is the 4070 worth it for 4k with dlss and frame generation? I don't really need to run it on ultra, mid high would be okay. 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p The horse hair (and every tiny object really) looks terrible because of the shimmering and the performance gain doesn't worth it too. Looks nice, plays well. DLSS Quality at 1080p output resolution is identical to DLSS Performance at 1440p output resolution. Things looked ugly, it wasn’t effective, etc. Reply reply heartbroken_nerd • Nothing nvidia is worth it rn if you got a 30 series looking for a generation upgrade. DLSS forces a game to render at a lower resolution (typically 1440p) and then uses its trained AI algorithm to infer what it would look like if it were rendered at a higher one 4K brings a considerable performance downgrade with a hardly noticeable image quality improvement for 1440p users. Text just looks better, and inevitably you will read text on your monitor. 4K performance dlss renders at 1080p 4K ultra performance dlss renders lower than 1080p. For what it's worth dlss gets me like 30 extra frames in cod Reply reply deadd0g Is it still worth it to run DLSS set to quality? Are there still additional benefits such as less frame drops, tearing, etc. Reply reply is a 1440p monitor worth it over a 1080p monitor? Honestly, yeah, if you plan on playing at 1440p and want to crank settings, the difference between DLSS and FSR is large and worth taking into account. 78x. New. Hoping to see a 4k UW OLED monitor release sometime this year to upgrade to. 1440p DLSS Quality playing with around 100 fps is a must and should easily be doable with your GPU (except for Starfield cause their engine sucks ass). It gives an even better image than using DLSS to upscale a 1080p image to 1440p, but of course you gonna need a very good card to do that. That's why every official Nvidia showcase only show DLSS working at 4K. Surely there is a difference visually, but the base resolution is so high that the ultra performance render resolution carries enough information for an upscale. Edit: also worth mentioning DSR will lower your FPS at the cost of the better looking game but you are able to get it back with DLSS now. You said you don't notice a difference between 144hz and 60 - which is a bit curious, but also works out in your favor if you do want to go 4k. Now I want to upgrade a bit and I'm wondering what card I should get, I'm planing to go 1440p 144hz so my old(but good) 1660 super won't be good enoth for it. I used to play at 1440p with DLSS in quality mode as it looked good enough for me but lately started to play at 4K with DLSS in performance mode. 25x (4K->1440p) + DLSS Quality (1440p->4k) combined looks really great and better than DLAA, but DLAA runs faster I run Baldur's Gate 3 at 1. iirc 4K quality dlss internally renders at 1440p. 0 offers four times the resolution, allowing you to render games at 1080p while outputting them at 4K. you can achievement the peak fidelity 4K has to offer. I would say that mostly depends on resolution. We didn’t utilize ray tracing or DLSS due to wanting to give the card its best shot at native performance You can't actually display 1440p on a 1080p monitor, so DSR is only bringing you supersampled AA, and then DLSS is using a lower resolution than 1080p to upscale and hopefully give you the same image with more performance. You use dlss to save some graphically fidelity but at the end of the day its meant to give you a nice boost in framerate. However, running a simillar rig (7600x, 32gb 6000mhz, 3090) dlss does not provide meaningful fps advantage other than on the most taxing maps like The overall image quality from, say, DLSS Quality mode is much better at 1440p compared to 1080p. jpyhag ixlhu huywuapa wpkn lsigp faacm xgijcof fedk pppc hayzbxid