Moq setup multiple calls. ShouldThrow<System.

Moq setup multiple calls Moq Verify Chaining regardless of the parameter used. Verify(mock => mock. x and you will see where you made the mistake. Is that possible? e. How to setup a method call inside another method call to return different results. The next link in the chain will be In addition to setting up mocks that behave functionally – i. . Setup and verify expression with Moq. Using SetupSequence is pretty self explanatory. Object, , _mockedObject7. MoQ how to set up for multiple calls of the same method. SetupGet() is specifically for mocking the getter of a property. You can specify that a group of calls should be done in sequence multiple times. public interface IDataProvider { T GetDataDocument<T>(Guid document) where T:class, new() } I'd like to mock it in a way, that it would just return a new instance of a given type, regardless of the exact type, something like: When the facade calls facade. I found a solution where I just call setup twice, once for each concrete type being used by the tested class, it's easier to show than to My compromise is if I need multiple configurations for mocks, I like to make helper methods to configure them. By making it a lamba, it is evaluated each time ProcessPayment() is called. It's lifetime should be extended outside of for loop, because you have no idea what Setup is going to do Moq now has an extension method called SetupSequence() in the Moq namespace which means you can define a distinct return value for each specific call. 3. GetVehicleByRegistrationNumber(registrationNumber) is called, the base Selecter wrapped by the mock will be called, which in turn will then call the mocked GetTyreSpecification that was overridden by the setup on the mocked subject under test. at 9:54 PM. Equals method to return false. Moq - Setup . In this example we will understand a few of the important setups of Moq framework. 6. CaptureMatch classes until seeing this answer. VerifyAll() after you setups to verify that all previous setups have been called (once If the setup simply returns results[index++] this is crystallized upon setup and each invocation returns the first element of the array. Dequeue); } I'm trying to unit test a function that makes a call to an API. Throws(new Exception("error")) // I want to get exception at first call . Its syntax is simple, add the Callback after the Return. Therefore giving the ability to specify different returns on the exact same function call whereby the variance is the number of times executed. DoSomethingAsync() but aren't setting it up to return anything. Setup(x => x. The last call wins and nullifies the previous two calls. 20. Therefore preventing the requirement to specify the mock expression multiple times (once on the setup, and once on the verify) This means that you must ask Moq to give you a Mock<B>. IsAny<string>())). Display(secondColor)); Assert. 14. Object); //Act and Assert } Moq - How to call the same setup with different parameters in a loop. You may want to read my post that describes the following: Supports method invocations, property setters and getters. If one just used. 12, it explicitly reset everything about the mock, from setups to event handlers. Returning different mocked values based on parameters passed in Unit Test with Moq. GetAsync<FieldResponse>("url"). How can I configure Moq to return new instance per call? 1. Object, It. string goodUrl = "good-product-url"; [Setup] public void SetUp() { productsQuery. The rest of the test is the same up to the Assert, where I check that counter has the expected value (line 16). MyMethod(It Skip to main content. 8. The important point to not it that the return value is set at the time that the setup is declared. Moq verify that the same method is called with different arguments in specified order. e. This would make sense from the viewpoint of Multiple Moq It. Setup(etc); _mockedObject2. SetupSequence(m => m. AddNumbersBetween(1,4), Times. In this case, all you want to test is that BuildVM is called and the result is returned so you don't need to mock the inner dependencies. Moq. We can do this quickly and succinctly with the newer Linq to Mocks syntax, or But I'd like having a different setup for each call of the WriteMessage method. var inputParamObject = new inputParamObject(); this. Instead, if you know that Fizz should be called once when transitioning to state 1, you can do your verifies like this:. But that's not quite right: your calls to Setup of Calculate are identical and thus the second one overrides the first. I have successfully done this using a mock HttpMessageHandler as below which allows me to fake a response from the API:. Here is the method I am trying to mock: TeamMember teamMember = _unitOfWork . Returns(mockSearchPanelVM); Because your mocking a class and virtual method if you don't setup a return value the actual implementation will be run. One common scenario is setting up multiple calls to a method or property on a mock object. Following unit test throws an exception, even though the according method will be called. Moq - Setup Property to return string from method parameter Handling Multiple Return Values. It's just the opposite of what one would expect: Usually the first match is returned I have an interface. Another little-known Moq feature you could use is argument capturing (e. This is because of how Moq works internally, but I'd hesitate to call it a bug and there is a bug filed for it. For example: If I have a mock object setup and call my Sut method. By mastering the techniques outlined in this guide, you can In Rhino Mocks to set return values for multiple calls to a method you simply specify the return value that many times. Setup(etc); var service = new TestedService(_mockedObject1. 28. : Since the tested class that decides the concrete type I can't pass it on the test. Compile(). Invoke() won't be executed, but instead it'll be transformed to an In last week’s part of the series, we looked at the two ways that we can set up testing mocks using The default behaviour of a Moq Mock object is to stub all methods and properties. Moq - How to call the same setup with different parameters in a loop. In, which can capture arguments passed to a method. Result after the method arguments brackets – If you are trying to test the functionality of the Process method you should not be using a mock, you should be using a real instance of the class and mocking the IController interface and mock DoSomeStuff to return an expected value and then verify that Process correctly handles that value. As part of the setup, Moq uses the LINQ Moq is one of them. Ask Question Asked 12 years, 10 months ago. But I am using NSubstitute. GetCallbackMessage (2nd setup), it returns a message with type 0 per default. Provides loops which allow you to group calls into a recurring . Ask Question Asked 12 years, 2 months ago. In the example bellow the first call will return Joe and the second call will return Jane:. I have some troubles using Moq. IsAny<IFilter>())) My unit testing method is as follows [Test] public void TrackPublicationChangesOnCDSTest() { //Arrange // objDiskDeliveryBO = new DiskDeliveryBO(); //Act var actualRe In last week’s part of the series, we looked at the two ways that we can set up testing mocks using Moq. Verify multiple invocations with MoQ how to set up for multiple calls of the same method. How to set up a method twice for different parameters with Moq. Data. Query() . Once()); // or however many times you expect it to be called objectUnderTest. GetById(It. IsAny<int>()) . it verifys the expression was called only. Verify() statements before it. Single()); What I want to do is to define one or more Setup(s) to one Return call on multiple method calls of the mocked object; hence avoiding multiple single calls to do Setup(). Setup method in Moq, ambiguous call. In(calls))); CollectionAssert. Hot Network Questions As an adverb, which word’s more idiomatic: “clear” or “clearly”? I'm looking for an explanation of exactly how moq's Setup method works when setting up a mock object that will be called multiple times from the 'system under test' (sut). IOException>();: And finally, the time to test your SUT, this line uses the FluenAssertions library, and it just calls the TransferFiles real method from the SUT and as parameters it receives the mocked IFileConnection so Initialize the Mock and Class Under Test Before we jump into the verify, setup and callback features of Moq, we'll use the [TestInitialize] attribute in the MSTest framework to run a method before each test is executed. IO. Chances are you can refactor out the repetitive bits. return values based on their inputs – Moq’s fluent syntax has some other methods. Returns(Task. Callback<idnameobject, int>((obj, id) => callback = obj); await myservice I don't think you can reset a mock like this. That way my tests still get individual instances, but I can write my setup like: var apiMock = CreateRateLimitedGetCustomers(); var sut = new CustomerFetcher(apiMock. To avoid duplication of code you can use the repetition How to mock a method that is called multiple times in single call using Moq in C#. I have solved that partially, but I would still like to have the assertion in the setup (e. GetByFilter(m=>m. Along with Returns, we also have: Throws, which causes a mock to throw an Verifying multiple method calls in C# mocking frameworks like Moq is a powerful tool for writing robust unit tests. Reset(); How can I reset only the configured setu Strict); //unexpected calls causes VerfyAll to fail //Set default value behavior (Empty, Mock, Custom) //Empty = returns default value (null for refences) //Mock = returns default value for value types and Mock objects for reference types (always returns the same mock object for the same method or property) //Custom = Doc says set the Moq Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand; OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams; OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs; Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing; About the company Visit the blog Using Callback. Id == i). I want my code look like this: mock. Allows you to specify the number of times a specific call should be expected. However, the callback isn't being invoked until the GetByFilter method is invoked. And each time with a different parameter. Capture and Moq. Trying to create Moq object. Object, _mockedObject2. This continues the loop until the test completes. Thanks a lot for your help. Raises(i => i. Better way to setup test with Moq. Since you use Capture directly in the parameter list, it is far less prone to issues when refactoring a method's parameter list, and therefore makes tests less brittle. With Moq, we can set up expectations for method calls, return values, and exceptions, all within the controlled environment of a test. I'm trying to verify that, a method in my moq mock object will be called upon two successive API calls. private static Mock<HttpMessageHandler> GetMockHttpMessageHandler(string mockResponse) { var mockMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>(); What's the most succinct way to use Moq to mock a method that will throw an exception the first time it is called, then succeed the second time it is called? c# unit-testing If you need to Setup a return value, as well as Verify how many times the expression was called, can you do this in one statement? From what I can gather, Moq's Setup(SomeExpression). Some good ideas there! Returns can accept a Func<> to call to find the return value, similar to Setup(). This means that a call to that method/property with any parameters will not fail and will return a default value for the particular return type. Moq allows you to handle scenarios where you need to return different values for multiple method calls. The example below shows one method that i need to test. Moq: Test parameters sent with sequence of method calls. So it is one way to solve this issue. The general idea is that that you just chain the return values you need. So by the time you get to the second service call, your I get a Moq object to return different values on successive calls to a method. g. You may be able to find a better way of modeling your class than having multiple almost-identical methods that you have to invoke or test in almost exactly the same way. SetUp(w => w. Object. You need to define what you want to test. In Moq 4. Url== Setup Moq to return different values on multiple calls. Luckily, the Returns method is overloaded so that you can defer its execution as well:. SetupSequence(s => Unfortunately, MoQ doesn’t work that way. Invoking(x => x. C# - MOQ: How to add moq on this coding? 10. AreEqual(calls, expectedCalls); Setup Moq To Return Multiple Values. Moq doesn’t have a nice way of defining mixed return values (not that I can find anyway) however you can implement the same thing using callbacks, which we’ll cover in a later post. E. 2 You do need to setup a return value for the BuildVM method in the Arrange section before you call the SearchPanel method. Hence, your mock object's setup does not get hit. 2. To support multiple calls in a chain, I instead did this in the base class: I have a method called GetTasks() that returns 10 tasks objects. Moq the result that depends on input. Callback<SomeRequest>(r => Great answer! I was unaware of the Moq. 72, it is still available without even a deprecation warning. You will get a failure message like this if any calls were made: Half the links I try off the Moq page are broken, including the one for their official API documentation. we are using Moq and XUnit for testing Can anybody let me knw how can I mock only the GetUser and CreateUser and write unit test for the SetupSequence is used to setup a sequence of returns based on the number of the attempt to use the method that is being set up. Calling a method twice with different values Unit testing using MOQ Add a method to the setup of a Moq test. Modern answer (Moq 4. Some methods perform multiple calls in a sequence. In other words, you can set up expectations for successive calls of the same type. Another approach is to use the built-in Callback that can execute on each method that is Setup on a mocked service. Moq and multiple method setup. BuildVM()). Stack Overflow. TeamMembers . Setup(i => i. I wish there was a way like this: restClient. IsAnyType and It. NET? Most of the times, Moq will be used to mock service interfaces and their methods. mockFoo. Verify(x Im new to MOQ and I am a little confused with the setup method. Returns(4) . IsAny<int& _product object CalculateDiscount method is not used above. mock. If you cannot, or don't want to, use MockSequence, you'll have to work around this using a counter Benefits of using Moq framework. This Hi @uecasm, thank you for taking the time to submit this proposal. That’s the approach I found on Matt Hamilton’s blog post (Mad Props indeed!) where he describes his clever solution to The different overloads of Returns<T> behaves differently:. customerService . mock. However, this means that the emitted type derives from B, and while it can override MyMethod (which is still virtual) and call its base (B. DoSomethingAsync(It. Moq uses expression trees for Setup method in Moq, ambiguous call. The method under test returns the latest time from two dates, so I create two Moq Setup not working, the original method is still called. Let's explore how you can effectively handle multiple call setups in C# using Moq. How to use Moq in unit test that calls another method in same class. I’ll wait here While I would argue you should begin your TDD journey by writing your own mocks; using a framework will certainly make like easier in many Later in the code, betRepository. In this example, I use it to increment a counter (line 6). With it, you can verify call order like this: var calls = new List<string>(); var mockWriter = new Mock<IWriter>(); mockWriter. Returns(new Queue<TResult>(results). Is<string>() Matching Arguments. IsSubtype<T> types were introduced, which you can use to mock generic methods. At the time of the mock setup there might be different situations which we need to implement during unit test Whenever the CallbackMessageProcessed is called i create a called back where I redo the setup. Sample from the How to verify multiple method calls with Moq. 88. When the call to the property is being intercepted, the setup that matches it is found with the following code: TL;DR: Setup = When, Returns = What Whenever you write unit tests then you want make sure that a given piece of functionality is working as expected. The part where I'm confused is the returns call. A small refactoring will help you better test your code . 12. 13 the It. public class MyApp { private readonly IDataProvider _dbProvider; private readonly IHelper _h; public MyApp(IDataProvider dbProvider) { _dbProvider = dbProvider; _h = new Helper(_dbProvider); } public void Process() { string query = "something"; // This method will I know there is an answer for Moq. Moq Setup override. ValidateUser(username, password) Principal = principal. MOQ - verify method with parameter executed regardless of the parameter used The above code only sets up the Get callback on SecondNumber (because it is the last time SetupGet is called). This can be achieved by chaining multiple Returns calls or using the ReturnsSequence method. In the arrange section, we setup that: the first call to GetIntValue returns 0; the second call returns 1; the third call returns 2. Re "no longer supported" (thanks for the link General Grievance!!!): in Moq 4. Callback<idnameobject, Allows verifying whether method calls in a Moq setup are invoked in the correct order. My test looks something like: var callback = new idnameobject(); wsMock . But there is a lazy version which uses Func<T>. In this example lambda expression is what you pass to Setup call, and external variable is i loop variable. DoStuffToPushIntoState1(); foo. SomeMethod(It. objectUnderTest. How to verify multiple method calls with Moq. MOQ - setting up a method based on argument values (multiple arguments) 3. An example could be a test that expects a resource to be opened, read and then closed where these operations should always be done in sequence the same Setup Moq To Return Multiple Values. Moq I am attempting to test a feature that relies on multiple QueryAsync; however, when apply the second setup, it overrides the first mock setup, even if T is different. Mock one method on a class instead of the whole class using Moq? 88. As shown earlier, methods can be Learn how to use a single Moq setup to efficiently return multiple argument values in your C# software development projects. GetByFilter(It. Triggered += null, this, true); Here is the snippet form GitHub I recently created Moq. You can try to this in your Product class: public bool GiveCard() { return _product. ToList() . State = System. Using the lambdas is not too messy. I am setting up my moq to return the callback, so I can interegate the parameters I have called the web service with. At the time of the mock setup there might be different situations which we need to implement during unit test configuration. Trigger()). The second is the ability to chain a setup with a verify in a single statement. Capture is a better alternative to Callback IMO. Modified 8 years, 2 months ago. Setup(m => m. You do need to setup a return value for the BuildVM method in the Arrange section before you call the SearchPanel method. IsAny<int>())). Sequential mocking allows you to return different values on the same or different consecutive calls to one and the same type. SaveChanges(); return betToUpdate; } Why it Well in that case the problem can be reduced to passing the proper expression tree to Setup. Moreover SUT must call those two dependencies in proper order [] 'invoker' and 'sender' are two different dependencies. CalculateDiscount(Price, Discount) > 300; } Whenever I call . ShouldThrow<System. _mockedObject. Setup(mk => mk. DoSomethingAsync(). UnitTests - Moq - How to Return() object from Moq that matches Parameter in Setup() 4. But most of the time the functionality depends on some other components / environment / external source / whatsoever. The one with T Returns<T>(T value) what you are using is always returning the same instance. Setup(foo => foo. Setup(x => MOQ - setting up a method based on argument values (multiple arguments) 12. Putting the calls to SetupGet in the Callback is unnecessary and Moq has a little-known feature called Capture. I recently came across a problem, using the Moq mocking framework, in which a few tests, required a method on one of my mocked objects to be called multiple times but return a different value depending on when the call was made. VerifyNoOtherCalls(); That method makes sure no calls were made except for any previously verified ones. Sequences. Moq simplifies the process of creating mock objects, defining their behavior, and verifying interactions. InSequence(sequence) . Verify(x => x. Even worse, if you use the same mocks in multiple tests methods you end up repeating this setup code in each test! Not feeling satisfied with this, I tried using a simple Factory Pattern to If using MOQ 4 one can use SetupSequence, else it can be done using a lambda. Write(Capture. moqActionFactory. MyMethod. Note that Setup expects an expression tree. We know that we can have multiple setups for the same mock, and the mock will respond based on that setup, so we just need a way to differentiate between those requests. The method under test returns the latest time from two dates, so I create two datetime objects and pass them to my function. Hmm, on second thought, please disregard the above post. AtleastOnce()); I cant figure out how to setup the method AddNumbersBetween such that if the upperVal is lower than the lowerVal an exception is thrown. [TestMethod] public void CreateFinishTest() { // mock methods Moq dynamically creates a class of its own based upon the IDateTimeProvider interface, and fills in any implementations the interface may have. Fizz(), Times. Returns(true); (note the use of . @Julian, Currently the setup looks clean as I've mentioned only 4 arguments in the above example, but I would need to pass 26 parameters like this, so writing this in 26 separate lines doesn't seem that good, but if there was a way to pass it in a single Mock setup, I can still format it in such a way that there would be 5 arguments per line, so it's still better than having Is there a way to setup and verify a method call that use an Expression with Moq? The first attempt is the one I would like to get it to work, while the second one is a "patch" to let the Assert part works (with the verify part still failing). I have successfully used a single "catch all" parameter like so: mockRepo. Modified; siteContext. Verify(m => m. 10. to my specific case it would be nice to see if there is a way to allow for multiple unknown amount of returns on a setup in Moq before another return is Check the Moq Quickstart: Events for versions Moq 4. ValidateUser(It. IsAny<SomeRequest>())) . moq SetupSequence with queue only executing first time. Triggered += null, this, true); Here is the snippet form GitHub WE have service which calls method GetUserAccountNo() in turn call other two (GetUser, CreateUser) in that service . You can then specify the Setup extension, which allows you to provide an expectation for when the DayOfWeek method is called, effectively overriding the method. IsAny<string>()) new ValidUserContext() ms. 8 or later): mock. They are looks like T Returns<T>(Func<T> value) and they will evaluate each time the parameter function when the setup method is called. Your UserHostAddress property might be called few times in call to Any, and we do not know how many times it's gonna be called (depends on content of internalAddressRoots). Verifiable() called along with Verify(), basically does a Verify(SomeExpression, Times. Reset in any mock using Moq 4. Display(firstColor)); mock. This is done by this extension method: public static void ReturnsInOrder<T, TResult>(this ISetup<T, TResult> setup, params TResult[] results) where T : class { setup. Calling a method twice with different values Unit testing using MOQ. DoStuffToPushIntoState2(); foo. By default setting a return value on a method call will always return that value no matter how many times it is called, so we can at least do the following: Bit late to the party, but if you want to still use Moq's API, you could call the Setup function in the action on the final Returns call: var mock = new Mock<IFoo>(); mock. This is because the code in the Returns method is evaluated immediately; that is, when the Setup method is being invoked. In this particular case, there are no mock. Therefore . Testing a method called many times in moq. If you are simply trying to mock your Entity class, then there is no I have a mocked method that looks like this: class NotMineClass { T Execute(Func operation) { // do something return operation(); } } In my code, I do such as: Check the Moq Quickstart: Events for versions Moq 4. IsAny<idnameobject>(), It. For example, I was writing some tests for legacy code where I Moq has a built-in way of doing this – SetupSequence. You will get a failure message like this if any calls were made: This works well when a method only performs a single call. Fortunately, there are many overloads of the Returns method, some of which accept functions used to return the value when the method is called. Setup(r => r. GetTasks(It. AreNotEqual(firstColor, secondColor); I believe I found the root cause of the issue, Mock. An example based on your code which demonstrates what I am talking about : Moq this setup was not matched for setup that matches the calls. Sequences which provides the ability to check ordering in Moq. Entry(betToUpdate). Returns(() => { // Subsequent Setup or SetupSequence calls "overwrite" their predecessors: // you'll get 1 from here on out If you regularly use TDD, then you are familiar with the concept of mocking. Modified 12 years, 2 months ago. Mock one method on a class instead of the whole class using Moq? 52. Returns(mockSearchPanelVM); Moq is one of them. An example based on your code which demonstrates what I am talking about : Moq this setup was not matched for setup that matches Im new to MOQ and I am a little confused with the setup method. Something you can do with Rhino Mocks. 1. Moq - Verify method call that has a params value. Short of MockSequence, Moq currently has no other built-in API that would allow you to verify proper invocation order across several mocks. TransferFiles(myInterface. FromResult(fakeFieldResponse)); // I want to get a value at second call What I write: var mock = new Moq<IFoo>(); mock. So I'll ask here. Enter Moq, a powerful mocking framework for C#. Thus, it will make sure the mock was never called at all. However, you can also write mock. If you don’t use TDD, then you need to slap yourself and apologize to Bob Martin, Michael Feathers and Ron Jeffries immediately. In this article we will use Moq as our mocking framework. To set up multiple calls with Moq, you can use One area where using MoQ is confusing is when mocking successive calls to the same method of an object. sut. I was hoping that it would work differently for different T's or by ch Modern answer (Moq 4. MyMethod), it has no way of getting to the original class and verify that B calls base. Url== In the above example, when selecter. SetupSequence is used to setup a sequence of returns based on the number of the attempt to use the method that is being set up. I want to moq this task for unit testing purposes. 32. Took a quick peek at the Moq source code and it looks like if you use Setup() on a property getter, it will call SetupGet(). mockObject. UpdateBet(bet) is called, but its not my mocked method which gets called, instead, the class's method gets called: public virtual Bet UpdateBet(Bet betToUpdate) { siteContext. 4. You are mocking ws. I can setup a basic Moq for the above as follows: (1,4); and then verify that it was called. [TestMethod] public void CreateFinishTest() { // mock methods Setup() can be used for mocking a method or a property. The DoThisAsync() method will fail because it will try to await null. Return()s. Capture. Protected is not doing the right thing when using reflection for Generic type methods, the following link provides more details about the root cause of they bug they have Get a generic method without using GetMethods. when I call AssertRequestParameters). It's as if the first Setup never occurred. mockSearchPanelVmBuilder. 0. Returns(pieces[pieceIdx++]); I have some troubles using Moq. It is free and simple to use. 5. You can fix this by changing your set up code to. - stakx/Moq. GetNumber()) . EntityState. When defining the behavior of your mock, you just chain together the desired result. Where(t =& Skip to main content How to verify multiple method calls with Moq. While this is an answer to my specific case it would be nice to see if there is a way to allow for multiple unknown amount of returns on a setup in Moq before another return is expected, if you do not have a second method like I did And in that case it fails at the first assertion because both calls to DateCreated return aTime. var requests = new List<SomeRequest>(); var sequence = new MockSequence(); foreach (var response in responses) { someMock. Here is the code: _crateRecallService. . wsMock. Moq offers several utilities to properly configure method calls. Bar()). You said that you don't want to Setup the calls, you want to consider call order right with your Verify calls. Mocking a method with conditional arguments using Moq. Returns((int i) => mockCollection. In): Here is a simplified example of my set up right now: [TestMethod] public void Test1() { _mockedObject1. How to setup the same method multiple times with When you use external variable from inside lambda expression - it becomes "captured" by this lambda expression and its lifetime is extended. AtLeastOnce)? i. Later added Setup calls are evaluated first (or always all are evaluated and last wins). Moq with same I have used this approach to capture each instance of a request to a method and also return a sequence of values. Object); // Is there a way to setup and verify a method call that use an Expression with Moq? The first attempt is the one I would like to get it to work, while the second one is a "patch" to let the Assert part works (with the verify part still failing). The compiler prov The disadvantage is that if Add is called multiple times then only the parameter passed in the last call will be checked (although you can additionally Verify that it was called once). All you need to do is switch the order of the two Setup() calls: ms. Where(x => x. Moq just has a strange execution policy. IsAny<string>(), It. Result). I'm attempting to mock and setup chained methods using Moq. You want to use Mock<T>. cchlosq aoe bjtun shzi iql tjuf crln ezffmw znatg sie