Fujinon 16mm f1 4 review indonesia reddit. 4 is an all-around great lens.

Fujinon 16mm f1 4 review indonesia reddit Only the 14mm is wider, with its 21mm equivalent coverage, albeit with a much slower f2. 4 R WR good for portrait and street photography? My favourite photographer on YouTube (serr) recommended this lens and it looks great but I want to make sure it’s good for both. 4, 23mm f1. 4, 33 f/1. Is the AF speed and noise good enough for video? The reviews I found only focused on stills. My setting is manual focus, red peak highlight, 1second interval When my lens aperture is not fully wide open, (>f1. Without the hood, it's about the same size as a 16 f/2. The f/1. 4 lens had been expected for some time and Fujifilm has finally formally announced them. I'm open to any advice on what to replace my Canon 50mm F1. I own both and they're excellent lenses. Unofficial Fujifilm subreddit for Fuji photographers to share photos, ask… When it comes to primes, the 56mm f/1. Actually, I own too many Fujifilm X bodies and lenses, including the 16mm f1. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. So the pancake lens doesn't have a wider aperture at all. I have the 18/1. com And XF 33/1. If the 33 f/1. 4 R WR features a high-speed autofocus of 0. If the 35 f/2 opened wider it would be a perfect lens. The f/2. 4, or only if you really need the bizarre manual focus ring of the 16mm f/1. Since i never owned a camera before ( but have used one then and there ) and even after researching lot of reviews in choosing a brand and a lens, I forgot to factor in the optimum F stops supported by the lens. This causes my timelapse photos to go out of focus by the time i hit 100+ photos! If you are ok for manual focusing (I consider it a beautiful experience) you can get TTArtisan 23mm F1. Jul 25, 2019 · The Fujifilm XF 16mm F2. 4 and 14mm f2. It’s wide enough to be a fun landscape, night, and travel photography lens, but not too wide so it’s no longer useful for casual daily use. 8 is shipping, the comparisons start and the decisive question is: should you get the 1. I switched over to Fuji xt3 with the Fuji f2 35mm and overall the Fuji is a stronger kit. 4 R Wr. 4 R LM WR review - Image resolution - LensTip. 8 is fantastic - sharp, solid AF, and very quiet. 4 is overrated, I just don't need it. 4 is the smallest/lightest really fast option and a great compliment to a 16. 4 or the 35mm f1. Apr 17, 2020 · The 35 f/1. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Fujifilm Fujinon XF 18 mm f/1. 4 because it offers a much better value (for me) than the Fuji 23mm f/2. If you want a challenge and get some very striking photos, the 16/1. 4 is good and can be bought used for a reasonable price. I'm considering getting the 16mm F1. The Fujifilm 16mm 1. Although I don't really think that is that crucial for a wide angle lens. I think the above video by Gajan Balan does a good job of relaying why the XF18 hasn’t won […] Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 8: Price and availability. I come from full frame and my last Sigma Art 35mm was over 700g and about double the volume. 4 will disappoint. 8 has big distortions but that's the price you pay for the compactness. 4 is a great all arounder that is also good for portraits. 2 R APD ($1,599. 4, and 90 f/2. The XF 16mm ($999. Of course the 16 works well in auto-focus mode but is totally silent. I bought the Viltrox 23mm f/1. With the ring pulled back in MF mode it will not allow the use of the AF-ON back button as it does with non-clutched lenses. 4 was for sure less confident in its autofocus, but the extra stop really comes in handy. 4 R LM WR ($999. 4 was smaller it would be a perfect lens. Posted by u/hvris - 20 votes and 7 comments It could be years before the X-Mount gets a native 600mm that isn't Fujinon. I have the 35mm f/2 and the 16mm f/1. Also, the 16mm is much better for close up shots as it has a closer minimum focus distance and higher reproduction ratio. The 35 1. 8 is widely available and costs around $399 / £339. It measures 2. 4 or 18mm f1. 4 quality, by judging numerous photos. 4 R WR Lens Fujifilm. The 16mm f/1. 4 only if you really do shoot at f/2 or f/1. 4 alternative to the aging XF 18mm F2 R. Until now, I mainly used the wide end of my XF16-55 the few times the situation dictated a wide angle lens. Would also be nice to hear about if you like the focal length for video. I don't always need or want shallow depth of field/bokeh and switching lenses can get old. The 1. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of If money is an issue, go for a used 23mm f/2 or the sigma one. 4 doesn't really convince me in that aspect. I have both and the 18 hasn't been used in years now. The 16mm has great image quality but is a little bit older already, the 18mm should be more on par with 33mm 1. 4, but 18mm at F1. For example, lately the Fujifilm 18mm f2 is often referred to as a pancake lens, but while it’s relatively small (and I’m a BIG fan of this lens), it’s not a true pancake lens in the sense of being a thin lens that barely sticks out from the body. f/16 : Número de hojas : 9 (abertura del diafragma redondeada) Tamaño del filtro The time has come to upgrade to a new lens, for the moment I only own the kitlens together with my A6300. I was hoping they'd update it to be as quiet as the 27, but instead they made the 18 f1. 9 by I also just checked Frost's review for the Sigma 24mm 1. Is the Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1. 4 R LM WR Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. I am however a little in doubt whether to get the 33mm f1. The 16 mm lets you get slightly closer shots. 4 WR. The XF 16mm f1. Fujifilm X-T30 and Fujifilm 16mm f1. The 16mm is amazing but heavy and I'm not using it that much also because it lacks of IOS and at night that's something you want to have. 4 : Abertura mín. You might well find the 23mm to be too close in field of view to your 27mm. I picked one up used for $300 but ended up selling it and getting the Sigma Viltrox 13mm f1. 4 vs the 16mm 1. 2. The prices seem reasonable enough so it’ll be interesting to see how they perform. I have the 10-24 v1, 12mm Rokinon MF, 16mm 1. Oct 19, 2017 · It's an easy pick as Editors' Choice—if you shoot Fujifilm and want a fast, wide-angle prime, it's worth the investment. May 25, 2020 · But after a month of testing the Fujinon 16mm R WR F1. 4), everytime i half-press the shutter, i can hear the aperture closing. 4, and literally just received the 13mm Viltrox today. Taken with Fujinon XF 16mm f1. 4 (~$100) or Voigtlander Nokton 23mm F1. 4 mostly just for city shots and I want to pick up a 33 1. 4 is much older and many times more expensive. 4 more often though as it's an easier focal length for me to use, so much so that I'm planning on selling my 16/1. 4 and the 18mm 1. lenstip. My concern is primarily the size difference between the lenses. 8, a TTartisan 17mm f1. The 18 f/1. This lens works perfectly when shooting street and travel. 95) and the Fujinon XF 56mm F1. 4 lenses being superbly sharp wide open, which sets their f2 line at a rather strange position. 2, Fuji Feb 10, 2016 · The company sells two versions of its 56mm prime—this Fujinon XF 56mm F1. 4 in Fuji’s wide angle lineup. The XF 16mm f/1. Most of the time I use the 18 and 33. You can use it in a lot of situations: portrait ( mainly whole body), landscape, astrophotography, street photography, whatever. 4 - Which is best for you?! Hope your review helps me lol. Fujinon XF 16mm F/1. 4 is also much larger, however the possibility of using just the 18mm f/1. The xt3 is a everything you need if you're just a View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit [ Fujifilm X-Pro 2 + Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f1. 11 seconds, a weather- and dust-resistant structure that can work in temperatures as low as 14°F, and great portability thanks to its compact size. This lens is on my wishlist; it will fit my street-travel needs, especially in low light situations. 4: almost a macro lens. 8 are all clutched lenses. Fast and wide, the XF 16mm f/1. I am not used to 16mm but when I get it to work it delivers cool pictures. I've never rented a lens before, but I love the suggestion! Even though I could also consider the Fujinon 35mm f1. My primary reason for getting the 33mm and 18mm is the weather sealing and the linear motors. I am simply not so trained with that focal range. The older 1. It's not that I think the 16mm F1. 4 and 30mm f1. A winter morning in Lucerne, Switzerland. All photos edited with my Preset Pack: https://erenjam. The autofocus isn’t great, and the 2. 4 has less focus breathing and silent motors. This f/2. 4 R WR and on travel I find myself using the 16mm more primarily because of its ability to do landscape, architecture, and in a pinch street w/ context. You can only use MF with the focus ring pulled back toward the camera. I would take it along on month long vacations and generally never feel limited by that choice. 8 were mediocre at best, and the 50 1. 5 years later i still get the feels for that nostalgic look this lens gives me. 4 I suppose it's AF is not sufficient for my style of work. Whether you need that niche performance is Jan 10, 2019 · Fuji 16mm 1. Plenty of comparison videos indicate that the Viltrox provides excellent image quality with a few limitations, such as having softness at f/1. 4 is one of my favorites for wide angle photography and the minimum focus distance can make some cool shots. While the minimal focusing distance of the 16 mm 1. For general shooting I prefer the 18mm field of view, but I do like the quieter and faster focusing of the 16mm f2. So yes, I disagree, the 15-85 is excellent, and I stand by that. If you own an X-Pro 2 or X-T2 and require weather sealing, the other two wide angle lenses can’t hang. 4 Maximum Aperture & F/16 Minimum Aperture; 73. Plus it's a lot easier to crop a 16mm image to the 23mm's FoV than vice versa. 4, a kind of a place holder lens. The Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1. I like the slightly bigger fov from the Viltrox along with the f1. 4 R WR (A$1,499) carries a premium price, but backs it up with matching performance. I also have the 18-55 and 35 f2 and they sit in my bag 99% of the time because I'm so in love with the 16. It's also noisy as hell in auto focus mode. 4 I'm torn between the Fujinon 16mm 1. 4 delivers super sharp image quality throughout the aperture range, and the 16mm (24mm full frame equivalent) angle of view provides a uniquely I am looking to buy the two above mentioned prime lenses. 4 is still a niche lens. X-T4 + Fujinon 33mm f1. I have a wide range of both Fuji and non-Fuji glass and the performance of the 16mm F2. So this lens was very exciting to me when it was announced. (Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm F1. 4G vs Sigma 16mm f1. 4 looks like an optical excellence and I really want my Jul 18, 2015 · Fujifilm's lineup of fast primes is what sets it apart in the world of mirrorless cameras. 4 to get the 18mm with the XT5 Yeah size AND weight play a huge role why I prefer the 18 mm f2. 0 R WR and I love it - I just really wanted to get a f1. 4 R but I read that that particular lens is not recommended on the X-T5 as the resolving power is too low for the new sensor. 4 lens and the release of a new XF 33mm F1. It is for me my most natural focal length. 8 with the hood. Debating adding the 18mm to the collection but I prefer the 16mm focal length (24mm on full frame) more than the 18mm (27mm full frame equiv). Many people have recommended the Sigma 16mm f1. 4 for video? I’m considering buying this lens second hand and would mostly use it for stills, but if possible also some vlogging. 8 zoom as well. For the money, it's tough to beat the 35 f/2 it's just all-around solid. 4 are by far the best. It's is an awesome awesome lens. Aug 12, 2021 · The Fujinon XF 18mm f/1. If all you're shooting is snow anyway, vignetting is very easy to correct. 4 R WR. 4 Fuji vs Fujinon 35mm f1. 4 14. Bokeh is gorgeous, also because you can focus insanely close to your subject. Jun 26, 2015 · Front of the Fujifilm XF 16mm F1. 4 aperture, the 2. 4 back to KEH. 2/1. 4 + Fujinon 16mm f1. I find myself using the 23/1. 4 and F1. Starting with the amazing XF 35mm f/1. 2 RF which supposedly is exceptional). 4 which are the same size and weight roughly as your 23. 0, I would go for the Fuji 35 f2. (Also have a Fringer adapter on the Nikon 300 PF telephoto prime for wildlife. The 16mm 1. I really don't understand why Canon didn't have a good 50mm lens for such a long time (They now have the 50mm F1. 4 is probably the 3rd or 4th best Fuji lens. Instead of a kit lens i assumed a wide angle ( Fujinon 10-24 F4 WR) would be more practical for me. I've used the lens for the past 1 Sigma 18-50mm vs Fujinon 16-55mm vs Fujinon 16-80mm Trying to decide on a zoom lens for travel! I shoot mainly street scenes and landscape and so far my Fuji 16mm 1. 4 offers superb image quality, but the best part of this lens if the versatility in low light filming and photography. Second of all, the XC 35mm f/2 also a very small and light lens. 4 strikes a weird balance, at roughly the same size as the more premium f1. 4 and some chromatic aberrations, both of which go away once you stop down to f/2 or f/2. Posted by u/Charwinger21 - 5 votes and 4 comments The xf 16 f/2. I am using XH1's intervalometer to do timelapses. I The 16mm f1. 4 and can live with f2. 6 as a 16mm prime for this purpose. The lens covers a wide (24mm in full-frame terms) field of view, opens up all Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I own the Sigma 16mm, Fujifilm 23mm f1/4, 27mm, 35mm f/1. The "problem" with the fuji 23mm f/2 is that images are soft when shot at f/2 and close to the subject. 4 vs 23/1. 4 and got rid of it cause it felt a little too wide and I just wanted to landscape with my 16-55 F 2. But if you need the extra mm then the 16 mm is the way to go. Of course it vignettes at f/1. 4 is sharper wide open. 4 is impressive, the MFD of the 18 mm f2 isn't to bad either ! I highly recommend this comparison comparion Posted by u/RocktownLeather - 6 votes and 6 comments Hi. The mechanics on the 18 are definitely superior. First of all, your XC 35mm f/2 lens is one stop faster than the TT Artisan 27mm f/2. This lens looks unbelievable but I'm not sure if the 30mm would be better for what I want (group portraits & low light events). I suppose it's easier to justify the expense if the lens works well for that purpose, too. Rear of the Fujifilm XF 16mm F1. 4, which I would never buy because of the size. 4 R WR for your XF 16mm f2. 4, 35mm f2, and 35mm f1. 8 in low light, it’s significantly better across the frame than the f/2. Currently have and XT-4 with a 16mm f2. 4 Fujifilm Fujinon XF 18 mm f/1. I suspect the 18mm will be a lot more useful than you think especially considering you can continue taking the 35mm with you with minimal weight penalty. 3 50mm f2 Nothing special, but does everything well, including portraits. 8 R WR is a lightweight, wide-angle prime lens for the X system. Aug 29, 2024 · Fujinon XF 16mm F2. 4 has a 'smoother' rendering hence the "character". 4 Review | Bottom Line. 8 R WR is designed to be a more compact and affordable alternative to the company’s faster, larger and more expensive f/1. Finally tracked down and bought a 18mm f1. 8 hold up against it? Now that the 16/2. 4 is considered one of Fujifilm’s best lenses (if not the best). Jul 19, 2022 · The Fujinon XF 18mm F1. 4 R WR ; Construcción del objetivo: 13 elementos, 11 grupos (incluye 2 elementos asféricos y 2 de dispersión extrabaja) Longitud focal (equivalente en 35 mm) f=16 mm (24 mm) Ángulo de visión : 83,2° Abertura máx. 4, and following up with the XF 23mm f/1. The Fujinon 16mm f1. 4 or… Auto focus on the f1. Get the 16mm f/1. 124K subscribers in the fujifilm community. May 17, 2019 · The optic we’re looking at here is Fujifilm’s second 16mm prime lens, the first being the sublime XF16mm F1. A lot of times 16mm just doesn't feel wide enough and 13mm is a really nice sweet spot of being wide but not too wide. 4 and an 18mm f2. Anyone using the 16mm F1. I was really thinking about taking the 35mm f1. 2 was even less sharp. 2 R ($999. 8 has faster and quieter AF, weather sealing, and is obviously much smaller. Just as we’ve seen before with lenses like the XF23mm F2 R WR and XF35mm F2 R WR, the XF16mm F2. 4 Couldn't stand my sony anymore, tested fuji-waters with a used xe2 and the 35mm 1. 4 with :) For now I'll just stick with my Fuji. 4 just to compare: Jun 9, 2015 · Fujinon 14mm f2. If you have a different view, please let me know in the comments below. 4 WR ] [ Fujifilm X-Pro 2 + Fujifilm May 28, 2015 · SLRgear Review July 12, 2015 by Andrew Alexander. Not saying the 16 mm isn’t sharp but it’s slightly soft at 1. I am not aware of any of the Fujinon f1. 8 or XF 18mm f2 plus cash Price is $630 OBO shipped CONUS including PayPal G&S fees *Not in the pictures but the OEM box and packaging of the lens is included in the sale* I HAD the 35mm f1. For as much as these third-party lenses are seen as a cheap alternative, I'd generally prefer to get a used Fujinon equivalent. Feb 21, 2021 · The XF 16mm F/1. But yeah, good point, didn't consider that the 150-600mm might not be red badge. Or check it out in the app stores Tokyo in February 2024 - X-T4 + Fujinon 33mm f1. If you will be primarily shooting video, the 33 f/1. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. Viltrox 33mm f1. The old Fuji 23mm f/1. The question now remains whether the doubling in prize justifies the weater sealing, the apeture ring, the sharper image, the supposidly better AF and overall better image quality. 4 is the f/1. So within the past two months I had the 33mm f1. 4 primes like this with sealing but without the premium price of the Pro/PL primes. 4 vs 27mm 2. I'm not sure the difference between the 95g TT artisan 27mm f/2. 4 is special. The 18mm is is superior from a technical standpoint but I really like the 'character' of the 16mm. Locked post. Autofocus is moderately fast, and it's very accurate, especially at f/1. Torn between getting this or the 30mm f1. My lens is Fujinon 16mm f1. Look at some reviews for it. 4 + Fujinon 16mm Jun 3, 2015 · Jordan, Thank you for this excellent review! As a new Fuji X photographer, I have the awesome Fuji 16-55 f/2. The Fujinon XF 16mm ƒ/1. Fujinon 18mm 1. Not to mention potentially losing the moment. 4 managed to keep the "character" whilst being razor sharp I sold everything but the three Fuji lenses that I considered my "must have": the 18 f/1. New comments cannot I would personally recommend the viltrox 13mm f1. Jan 27, 2019 · The 16mm f1. $400 price difference. 4: APS-C Vlogging Lens Review If it only had a constant f/4 aperture, and weather resistance, it would probably qualify for being and L lens, and be the APSC answer to the 24-105 f/4L IS II. You can also consider the Sigma 18-50 f/2. 4 will feel really bad if you are used to the 50mm f2 or basically any newer fuji lens. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. Aug 6, 2024 · XF 16mm F1. I feel like the bokeh on this though would be a life changer. 4 aperture, but another potential advantage is the DoF markings. I love to hear the subjective part, the personal impressions. 4 R WR is optically quite good, excelling at falloff and distortion, as well as mechanical quality. 4 and it's pretty much the best of both worlds. 4 optical construction. I would think they'd do the logical thing and price it competitively with Tamron and Sigma. 4 to upgrade to the 33mm f1. At the end of the day I sold the F2 and upgraded to the 33 F1. 0. A quick run-down of what I've used each for: The 10-24 is my wide angle, landscape lens which I love to use for long-exposure waterscapes as well. If you are happy with the look of the 50mm f2, it's possible the 'character' of the 35mm f1. 8. Jun 11, 2020 · Taken with Fujinon XF 16mm f1. The few mm do make it surprisingly wider than 18mm, but also morphs the image a I've switched from 12+ years on Nikon to an X-H2s and have the 23mm f/1. 4. 4 is more subtle ) Also I noticed the new 33 1. 4 Pro/PL primes but with the performance of something like the older PL25 IMO. 4 to fill this role, and am hoping to increase the sharpness and detail of my landscapes. 8 unless you really need the 16 mm. 4 sounds like the ideal travel lens, especially after the sunset. 4 has a legendary reputation for photography (and I would definitely use it for photography as well), but I haven't heard any reports of how it does on a camera used as a webcam. 4 and sold my whole equipment within two weeks to get into fuji. My favourite type of photos is street/architecture and landscape I also like to photograph in low light situations. 00 at Amazon) is a hefty prime. My current 23mm lens is a TTArtisans 23F1. However, I went on the Beltline in Atlanta at golden hour and took some portraits in this wooded cove just off the path with some Beltline regulars using my XT5. 4, but that feels too close to my 23mm, which is my most-used lens. 4 Dilemma . 4 lenses do. Depends which type of portraits we're talking. They take exactly the same pictures. 4 + Fujinon 16mm View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. 4 and 33/1. 8, 35mm f1. 95) is the second of its focal length and gives fans of the angle an all-weather, f/1. I really like everythingabout this lens, but worry about how it… I am quite the opposite with 23-35-56 lol. 4 on youtube and reddit and so on. If we're talking about the likes of 7artisans that's a different story as they're really cheap and make some sense as a fun impulse purchase, but these Viltrox and Tokina lenses don't interest me. I honestly don't think 16 vs 18 mm is a big difference in most situations. 4 or F2, 16mm 1. Personally, I have great luck with my 16-55 f/2. Both can be found used for decent prices. 8 lens is smaller and far more practical than the 16mm f/1. An 18mm lens becomes a 23mm lens, very handy. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. But according to reviews and experiences, WR doesn't mean a lot. 4 is also a versatile lens. 8 prime wide open and despite sometimes necessitating a higher ISO, the resulting typically will require less noise-accentuating sharpening in post and will produce a better result Jul 23, 2023 · Just take a look at measurements in this professional review of new XF 18/1. It's an excellent value, but not an optical match for the pricier XF 16mm F1. 8 I’m trying to sell my 16mm f1. The Fujifilm XF 16mm F1. Apr 17, 2019 · The 16mm f/1. 4 essential facts: 16mm Focal Length (Equiv 24mm in 35mm format) F1. 4 regarding AF speed and sharpness. The 18's focus ring is notoriously loose. 4 in 30mm and 16mm, along with the kit 55-210mm. As you’re searching and receiving recommendations, note that the term “pancake” seems to be increasingly misused. The Fujinon XF16mm F2. 4 is an all-around great lens. Sunset in mythical Meteora, Greece. 4 VS 10-24mm f4 The 16mm f1. Then go from there. Awesome optics, but I miss the Fuji). The main advantage of the 16 mm f/1. Its autofocus is fast as I catch great shots of my kids (2yrs and 1yr). 4 over both of these lenses. 4 lens Thank you! It depends on your use case, I guess. 4 Jun 9, 2015 Anyone compared the two? I'm happy with my 14mm but could use the 2 extra stops of light as well as creative play with DOF . 22 oz) 67mm Yesterday I did a poll for the new 33 and 23mm f1. It's not just the cost of printing APD on the I live in the Blue Ridge mountains of North Carolina and find myself often capturing sunrise vistas, and I've basically been using my 16-50 3. 5-5. Mar 22, 2019 · Fujifilm XF 16mm Battle The Fujinon XF 16mm f/1. I'm a little late to the party, but I would definitely go for the Fuji 1. Don't throw your cash at something that expensive like a new XT5 without a decent hint of what you actually need in terms of gear. 4 R WR) Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1. com/shop/cinematicIn today's video I review the Fujifilm 16mm f11. 4, the 16mm f2. 4 mm diameter x 73mm; Weight 375g (13. 00 at Amazon). 2 and f/1. I have both and overall prefer the 16mm 1. Fujinon 56mm f1. Portrait of me, taken at a viewpoint above Las Teresitas, Tenerife I've also paired a 16mm F2. Fujifilm 16mm f1. Sep 8, 2015 · Fujinon XF 16 mm f/1. Afragisk, I too, was wondering how that zoom at 16mm compares to this prime at 16mm…I realize the prime should be better in terms of sharpness, but that 16-55 is the highest-quality zoom I’ve ever had the pleasure of using, and I’ve used everything from Nikon to Apr 15, 2021 · Excellent review, as always. 4 and 27mm 2. Personally, I sold my 35mm f1. ) Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. I have the 14mm F2. That's why I want a new 18mm F2 WR pancake. It's priced accordingly tho, so it's a fair balance, the system could use a few more solid f1. 4 R WR is a 24mm-equivalent wide-angle lens designed specifically for FUJIFILM X-mount mirrorless cameras. 4 and when I ended up going to a few of my local camera stores they all ran out of the 33 and the back order list for the 23 was a little too much for me to wait. 2, 80mm f/2. Fujifilm also makes an XF16mm F1. Fujinon XF 16mm F1. 4 was an interesting move by Fujifilm and while it is has been universally praised for its resolution it still hasn’t won everyone over that already loved the Fujinon XF 16mm f/1. Fujinon 16mm f1. 4 or a 35 1. And it’s fast enough to use it at any time, even in Nov 9, 2015 · Fujifilm XF 16mm f1. I got the 18 1. So, I got one of the new 33mm f1. Sigma 16mm f1. You either get some distance or shoot at like f/4. 174 votes, 14 comments. 4 is a great lens for tight spaces and low light. 4 is the second shortest prime in the current X-series lineup, delivering fixed coverage equivalent to 24mm. 4 R WR lens features both distance and depth of field scales on the barrel, making it suitable for manually pre-focusing if you find that the autofocus system is slowing you down. I need WR lenses for kayaking so the only 18mm that would work at this time is the $1K 18mm F1. 8 focal ratio. 8 I have each of the fast WR primes roughly covering this range (16mm f/1. 4 (same story as with the 50mm basically. It's a better lens and a better focal length than 16mm. I might be late. Had the 16 F1. I had the Fuji 16mm f/2. Now, I have a 35mm f2. Maybe sell the 18mm and get the 16mm instead The problem I have is that at f/4, I'd rather just keep using my 20-60mm which is f/3. 4 tho. 4 instead. 8 with an XT-4. 4 (best lens!!) 23mm 1. If you don't need the f/1. It’s kind of a unicorn for a 16mm, and it’s probably the best ultra-wide prime ever made. Long exposure of Akaka Falls on the Big Island of Hawaii. I sold my 35mm F1. Great [S/T][USA-WA] My Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm F1. 8 is likely the better idea, and easier to carry to boot. And in situations where the difference matters, I want to go wider than a 16 mm anyways. 4, and 56mm 1. Dec 8, 2017 · But both of those lenses are slower than the 16mm, so if absolute speed is your ultimate measure, there’s nothing to beat the XF 16mm f/1. Been using the 16 and 35 a ton lately but find myself needing something that fills in the middle of the two more often than not. The 50 F1. 4 vs Sigma Art 18-35mm f1. 8 lens and the 130g XC 35mm f/2 is going to be any kind of deal breaker Get a used XT2 or XT20 and the 18-55mm plus a decent prime like the 35mm F1. 4 R WR which is quite tempting, because it has a maximum aperture 2 stops faster – though it does cost almost three times as much. The 14 takes great landscapes but it’s old af. 4 because it offers about 90%of the optical quality as the Fuji lenses, has autofocus that is just as fast, and is quieter than the Fuji lenses, and it was possible to get a used copy for $200. But it's also the bokeh , which is much more pleasant to my eyes, the 16 mm 1. It has an amazing close-focus distance, which is at least half the reason people love it so much. 16mm f1. It is at least quite sharp in the center if you stop down to f4. The Fuji XF 16mm f/1. 4 is very good at that. 2 35mm f1. 4 primes. 4 R WR was released in May 2015, offering a 24mm-equivalent field of view with a very fast aperture. Having a difficult time figuring out which would be better for me. f/1. I agree. 4 or 56mm 1. com Fujifilm Fujinon XF 23 mm f/1. The Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm F1. 4 and cropping to 23mm in post is intriguing, especially since the perspective between the 18 and 23 shouldn't be that different. 4 and 33mm f/1. 4 and XF 56mm f/1. 2 or 23mm f1. 8 which I swapped for the Sigma 16mm f/1. Same goes for the 18mm f1. So how can the brand new little Fujinon XF 16mm f/2. Also if you don't 100% need the f1. 4 was weather sealed it would be a perfect lens. (The f2 contrast is stronger, more in your face while the 1. If the 35 f/1. 5 on the wide end. 4, 35mm f/2, 90mm f/2) but can't use each at once. Im very impressed by lens Fujinon 16mm F1. 8 have that covered! The 16/1. 2 (much more premium ~$700) Reply reply [deleted] I've been considering replacing it with an 18mm, perhaps the new f/1. With "Sports Finder Mode" on the X-T5 the image is cropped 29%, both raw & jpeg. 8 which is fantastic and better than 16mm F1. So in the end the 18-55mm is main choice when I wander around cities at night. 4 ART from 2015, and it shows soft corners and chromatic aberration at f1. 4 really did have a special rendering to it. I feel like it has a special style with the photos that it takes much like the original 23 and 35 f1. Sharper, faster AF just better. Auto and Manual Focus performance top. 4 for the 35mm F2 - I gotta say, the F2 was no doubt more reliable, but the F1. Used the 18mm F2 for years and took some of my favourite photos with that lens. Or check it out in the app stores Sony 15mm f1. 4 lens. com Open. 8 aperture is a little limiting imo. The 16-55 is an amazing lens but to me it’s a professional tool for when I need flexibility and speed, not what I shoot with for fun. 4 and Sigma 56mm and I still decided to keep I started on a Sony A6000 and had the sigma 1. They do have similar slow focusing issues like the 56 which I also own. 8 vs. Apr 16, 2015 · The XF16mmF1. 4 R LM WR’s but the damn thing was so heavy and large that I hated it. It's smaller, lighter, super super sharp, weather resistant, and cheaper to boot. 4, I’ve changed my mind. 8 macro and the XF 16mm f/1. The new lens sports an optical An update to the XF 23mm F1. 4 R WR has a manual focus collar. 4 R LM WR review . mtnoda iyyvbfx esjv teo zxslem kjt qhyre ytueg cwonfe xbs lnw qjpksp selfiv houdj umukn