Awaiting reviewer selection emerald sample. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer.

Awaiting reviewer selection emerald sample 2. However, I just noticed that the status of my For example, if you have compiled the table or constructed it, you can write the credit line as 'Author's compilation I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". 12 Dec 2024 Asia-Pacific Conference on Economics and Finance ‘LIVE’ After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. Emerald Studies in Alternativity and Marginalization; Emerald Studies in Child Centred Practice; Emerald Studies in Class Inequality; Emerald Studies in Class and Inequality; Emerald Studies in Computing and Communication; Emerald Studies in Criminology, Feminism and Social Change; Emerald Studies in Culture, Crime, Criminal Justice and the Arts Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. As a result of the research, 18 examples of unmanned smart hotels were identified. Peer review plays a vital role in selecting the right manuscripts for publication. I for example look at my assignments once a week. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. The paper stayed A multicriteria decision-making method for additive manufacturing process selection Diqian Ren, Jun-Ki Choi, Kellie Schneider. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Wait! It is not late yet. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations. I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received The team selects reviewers from our database, who have similar expertise to those listed in the keywords on the paper. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers by appropriate control groups. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. This is the process in IMEFM, and how long it takes: Process Stage Time taken Assign to • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Therefore, the research sample consists of 18 hotels. CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in The universe of the research consists of all currently operating unmanned hotels worldwide. A new prediction method is derived to obtain the confidence interval of the sample awaiting assessment which has no reference sample. Improve this answer. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. I didnt see the "under review Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). " This status has not been changed for a month. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). user32537 user32537. Because of the significant differences in the features and requirements of specific products and the capabilities of various additive manufacturing (AM) solutions, selecting the This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. At Emerald, 2. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. Use reviewers sparingly. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 3. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. Without reviewers continuing to commit time and passion to their peer review role, the integrity of research would be harder to uphold. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? All journal articles in IMEFM go through a double blind review process, this means if a submission is conditionally accepted, it will go through several reviewer processes. 1. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Becoming and being a peer reviewer is an important role to play in the scholarly landscape. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. In the first notification, I got a major revision. It’s also worth letting them know that our reviewers receive free access to 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Submission System says „awaiting reviewer selection“ since I submitted 3 months ago. If the reviewers agree, they provide their comments to the editorial team and the paper is then returned to the author with a decision and editorial and reviewer I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. This At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Further information. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. ). The fact that reviewers remain anonymous means they can speak honestly and impartially. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Review and selection of manuscripts. The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria. Secondly, it is probable the assigned As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. The reviewers are contacted and invited to review the manuscript. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. The immediate catalyst for the paper was, however, my coming across a special issue of a journal that referred to the use of Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. However, on the same day, the Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. Please email the Editor ([email protected]) with a statement (no more than 400 words) on why you would like to work on BREN and what you can bring to the journal, along with a copy of a two-page CV. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Sociologist 95d. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Add a The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The writing of this paper has been prompted by my experiences as a long-term editor of a journal (Tourism Management) for approximately 25 years and being a referee for even more years for a number of other journals. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. It is a dictionary containing a selection of terms and expressions that one is likely to encounter while studying and teaching subject indexing and information retrieval. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others Reviewing for an Emerald journal entitles you to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles). However, today, By using the grey relation analysis method, new calculation methods of the correlation coefficient and confidence value are presented. Is it a bad sign? I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. You have submitted your Case and Instructor’s Manual At TCJ and many other case journals, editors have two distinct types of revision decisions that can be selected – major revision or minor revision. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Applications . Sociology Job Market Rumors Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. It is best practice for an author to wait until a decision has been made before submitting to another Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Format Files formatted in MS Word Submitted electronically: Length Length of article conforms to limits set out in the Author Guidelines It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. " Does this A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high-quality articles: You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Once you have found If you’re reviewing a book, journal or article, and you’re looking for support including practical tips and guidance, take a look at our reviewer guides. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Add a comment | -1 . Meanwhile, knowledge of an author’s identity can help reviewers place an article in the context of the author’s Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. So, please give me I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. You don’t want to overload them and frighten them off for good. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. – Jon Custer. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Moreover, the confidence interval of the sample awaiting assessment is defined. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. There are around 600 entries described, cross‐referenced and arranged alphabetically (word by word). Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. We address the scaling issue of social entrepreneurship through the theoretical lens of sustainable business models. Responding to reviewers. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Recently Announced. This access is valid for a 90 day period from when you receive your access notification. However, in sum the research demonstrates that TR appears to be an effective tool for identifying innovative customers who would be both willing to participate in new service Introduction. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of The names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. A decision of major revision is most frequently generated in response to the first submission of a case Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 12:39. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple Purpose: This literature review aims to answer the calls for further exploration of scaling challenges and opportunities for social entrepreneurs (SEs). If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. We are very grateful for the contributions made. Please do also include the following in your application: Mention of your primary areas of research and/or professional expertise It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The sample size for Study II was relatively small and making empirical generalizations with confidence should await results from studies involving larger samples. Share. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. You could be recognised for your efforts; each year editors are asked to nominate outstanding reviewers for our Literati Awards. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. If, for example, claims are made about cross-linguistic influence from a particular language X Emerald’s journals ask authors to warrant upon submission that their work is original and not under consideration by any other publication. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Ideas for keeping reviewers. I wrote the editorial assistant, he answered paper is under review, but doesn’t know when decision will take Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. The journal told me I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. However, the name of the author is shared with the reviewers. Hotels within the same chain with identical applications and processes were considered as a single example. There is no set time for this to take. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 4. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. . A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Methodology: This paper investigates, on a multilevel approach, 340 journal articles published Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. My paper underwent a revision. The editor makes the final decision, taking into account Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Firstly, the conflicting decisions of the assigned reviewers can lead to changing the status to "selecting reviewers" or "awaiting reviewer assignment". This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. See best practice guidance for the following: Reviewer verification Review content; Reviewing a paper yourself ; Peer reviews by early career researchers Recommended reviewers Reviewer verification. Once you’ve found a good reviewer, it's good practice to let them know how much you value them. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers.