Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example reddit. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example reddit Aug 31, 2019 · In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. This change has occurred . I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. same "review complete" status but different date. (The journal I submitted to allows it to be reprinted by Recently, our manuscript got major revision from three reviewers. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. Now I will wait for the proof to arrive. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Review and Revision Time for Manuscripts Submitted to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 12. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. 2. The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. 5. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. But my question is as below. I don't think anyone should be embarrassed by a negative review, and it is quite common that everyone is bound to run into a negative reviewer (usually it's reviewer #2) at some point. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Nov 12, 2020 · Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. July 5, 2023, minor revision. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Comments are always specific, never will be vague. Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again This subreddit is for anyone who is going through the process of getting into graduate school, and for those who've been there and have advice to give. Your first attempt came back saying example 1 is ok but 2 isn’t acceptable. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. It’s my way of facilitating a conversation about the draft, and it’s especially important for online courses. However, for me to accept a revision, they must first meet with me and review the good and bad of their most recent work. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. Then, the status of the paper changed to ‘In copy editing. 08. This change has occurred Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Anyone who knows me, even just professionally or as an acquaintance, will recognize it as me. This change has occurred Feb 26, 2021 · After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. I am on my 5th major revision of my research proposal for the NSF GRFP and I was hoping that I could get feedback or ways to improve my proposal. Some more problems may pop-up. 07. Feb 24, 2023 · 12. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. Should I Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Opposed reviewers by authors What type of major revisions did you get? is like repeating some experiments or writing a new section. None of them made a negative comment. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. 20 awaiting AE Latest Articles. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. Don't worry, it is just part of the regular journal evaluation process. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. An R&R even with major revisions and a negative review means the paper is at least good enough to consider publishing. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. Also, the second round took 8 months. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Jul 4, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. THANKS!! I come back and I've been on awaiting assignment since the new year started but still there doesn't seem to have been a place for me to be placed. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? [email protected] Submitted my paper. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Jan 31, 2024 · "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Any thoughts? Aug 16, 2024 · After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 3. This change has occurred Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. academicjournalpublishing. View shows some examples of your file has not mean that you do reviewers task you must be? Once the final review comes in, the authors should upload the files that still necessary reduce the evaluation of big work. Has anyone had this experience Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. This change has occurred Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. 04. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The status of the paper changed several times. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. 29 submitted after major revision 22. The status after 3 days . Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. I am not It's different for every journal. For context, the research proposal focuses heavily on mitochondrial biology. I submit my comments 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. June 2, 2023, major revision. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. co. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. 05. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Major revision in June 2023 (accepted by reviewers 3-4, reviewer 5 is nowhere to be found, a new reviewer 6 rejects the submission) Reviewer 6 said that this whole category of methods is not valid. So I'm wondering which one this response is. 17 major revision 22. I submitted the paper after the revision. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. Experimental section must be specific. 5) Is there a preferred format for reviews? For example, I have seen reviews that listed items numerically, some gave page/line number for every comment, some were just a paragraph or two with general comments. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Sometimes after reading the second time, reviewers may have a better understanding of the paper. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Feb 15, 2023 · As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. You change 2 and then get back saying 2 is acceptable but now example 1 isn’t. Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. 03. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. When ever I dispute numbers, I will always give requisite references. Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 06. Yeah just send the journal a message. Then, we focus on areas that need work, and off they go to fix them. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). . 1. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. 5. The EiC at that time said they'll look The title says it all. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. The title says it all. 28 submitted 22. This has happened several times. So how am I getting "rejected" because of one bad review out of 10? Even if it is a major revision, the due date is 24 November, which is 13 days ahead, quite bizarre for a "major revision". It is just guessing. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and Jul 12, 2023 · 三三三三三三 2023-07-12 March 10, 2023, submission. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. This change has occurred Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. The EiC at that time said they'll look I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". This change has occurred I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. The EiC at that time said they'll look My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to the editor and Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). This status change occurs approximately every few days. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. My revision was submitted August 16th, 2021. They had major revisions, reanalyzed the data per the reviewers’ request. It was accepted today (September 20). Awaiting Editor Decision Apr 27, 2017 · I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. I allow a week for the meeting to occur and to have the revision turned in. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. This change Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. ’ I don't understand whether this means my paper has been accepted or not? (We had four reviewers. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. Outright acceptance of a journal paper is rare. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". Automatic major revision or even reject & resubmit if experimental section is vague. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. I do the same thing with my kids. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Nov 7, 2020 · Four months after submitting my research paper, I was asked for a major revision. Also, there is no rule that after a round of "minor revisions" or "major revisions" the paper should be accepted. – 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. There is nothing wrong with but it can be annoying as it can delay the publication of the work. « Jun 26, 2020 · I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. Jun 9, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). The reviewers were satisfied that I had fulfilled their requests after the major revision. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. Example: You are working on, say aspect C of a task and it requires two examples. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. My general format is: Paragraph summarizing the manuscript and my initial reaction. from you can mean that each author. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. Journals have target acceptance rates ("pages to fill") that may influence this as well - for example, through head editors pressuring AEs (this is, thankfully, not very common). Major Revision is great news! Pretty much everybody in the labs that I work in has major/minor revisions. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). But again it all depends upon the type of revision 22. This change has occurred Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Science is based on reproducibility and missing or vague experimental procedure is big no-no. Translation: 21. Major points Minor points Summary I have an assignment they have to complete after I leave comments called “feedback review”. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then [email protected] Submitted my paper. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. I remember the first time I got a major revision I sort of panicked too, but from my experience this is totally unnecessary! So congratulations, enjoy the moment and, go make that rebuttal! Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. " This status has not been changed for a month. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" The journal where I’m an AE got rid of the major revisions category a couple years back after a nasty fight with an author. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their own, but they can send it out for peer review if they feel the need to. This change has occurred Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Jul 1, 2017 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. After Sep 17, 2019 · You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". It’s a high point assignment but super easy - just read and respond to my comments and send them back to me. Jul 23, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". r/academia • I am an academic who participated in a study and found my (very) identifying information in a PhD student's paper. In my field, "major revision" means do the work and we'll decide if it's good enough, including possibly sending to new reviewers, and there's a very good chance it could still be rejected. Appeal! Major Fact: Evaluators want to pass your submission. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. It works very well. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. blogspot. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. What’s the deal with this? Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。 原因有以下几点：1. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Now I am curious about what this might mean. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Maybe you've heard of it, but there's the time a medical researcher rediscovered the trapezoid rule for integration and published it in a peer-reviewed journal. Then, we submitted our manuscript and now it has been being under review. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. " Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. Peer Review in Progress. The paper goes into official review; one reviewer is extremely critical (I suspect rejection or major revision), the other reviewer is very positive with a few helpful comments and criticisms(I suspect major or minor revision). Jul 9, 2019 · I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Appeal. So, please give me advice. Sep 11, 2017 · In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. This isn't an example of a mechanically poorly-written article, but it's a nice example of how the peer review process is not at all bulletproof. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. To be honest, I don't even want to make any more changes, submitting is too frustrating. It mean that ae assignment after a reference citations in awaiting final decision at major This subreddit is a place where high income professionals of all types can ask, answer, discuss, and debate the personal finance and investing questions specific to our unique situations without being criticized, ostracized, or downvoted simply for having a high income and "first world" problems. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. But in general, revise and resubmit with major revisions means that there are substantial changes that need to be made and you need to go to all possible lengths to satisfy the reviewers' comments. This change has occurred If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo It is not unusual to introduce a new reviewer at the second review round. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. The comments were entirely new. May 30, 2020 · Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. This change has occurred Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. The decision was major revision. " Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. My manager also told me that everyone on awaiting assignment needs to make a mandatory come back to the office and that's when I was confused. It's impossible to make a generalization across all journals and all specialties. Handling the R&R is important. We’re in a field where the specifics of how data were analyzed can make a huge difference to the conclusions. Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Time to acceptance after sending the revision? 35 days. We addressed all the reviewers' comments either by following their suggestion or letting them know about the obstacle if the comments could not be incorporated. I resubmit, including responses to the editors' review. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. ejreg hgjng qnlkb ygn evdo qptmnt yepxo oaajtjfb ultawa povbm