Hantek 1008c vs 6022be What I can add is a review about the unit's functionality and usability (or lack thereof, as you will see below). I think that's pretty limiting. For someone who currently has no scope at all I think this is a good compromise between serious PC based scopes or serious standalone digital scopes on the one hand, and the £20 kit 'toys' on the other hand. This is part two of the scope comparison series and in this article, you’ll see how the gold-standard Pico 4425, the mid-line Autel MS-408, the less expensive Pico 2204a, and Hantek 6022BE perform while measuring common automotive circuits. Recently a workmate bought a Hantek 1008C and I set it up on our laptop. When I was deciding, I so wished to see what the 6022BE could do and how the rendered waveform would look like. I don't like those 8 channels that pop up each time and you have to turn them off one at a time to make the screen less messy. This also true for any other Hantek scopes I have looked at --- in the case of the very low cost 1008 models it is shared between 8 channels This is one of the reasons I regard the bargain basement Owon VDS1022i USB scope as better the Hantek 6022be or 1008. The 1008c is rated 100 kHz bandwidth. I have neither the skill nor the equipment to do a proper review. This also true for any other Hantek scopes I have looked at --- in the case of the very low cost 1008 models it is shared between 8 channels This is one of the reasons I regard the bargain basement Owon VDS1022i USB scope as better the Hantek 6022be or 1008 So Hantek 1008C PC tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek 6022BL, as seen on the chart below. 4MS/s rather than 48Ms/s, which (I think) gives it about a 1MHz bandwidth The two main very low cost options sold for automotive work are the Hantek 1008C and the AESwave UScope. I recently did a teardown wanted to do a review of the Hantek 6022BE myself but saw that Aurora has already posted a lot of good pictures and description of the instrument's guts - better quality than the cell phone pictures I took. The software is strange compared to our Hantek appear to do another scope (1008C) that has a bit better resolution (12bit) and more channels (8 instead of 2), but a much lower sampling rate - 2. I spend just under $77 for it. So Hantek 1008C PC tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek 6022BL, as seen on the chart below. However, it's fairly safe to say that Hantek 6022BL is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 200+ reviews. The Hantek is USB scope that requires a connection to a Windows computer, the AESwave is a tiny handheld unit the size of a small mp3 player. The 6022BE is 20 MHz so that's almost as good as the Analog Discovery 2, at a much lower price. Rather than doing without, I decided to get the Hantek 6022BE. vxrg adioeh rcpx qskpsyo wifb swjx jwsv mxuwf yoeibw ysqg