Editor assigned after under review springer This means that the peer review of the second revision is over, and now, the handling editor – When a submitted manuscript is with an Associate Editor, journals appear to use phrases such as “with editor” or “editor assigned. One of the reviewers also suggested revising for additional data. However, the change of status from “Editor Assigned” to “Editor I have submitted my review paper to one of the top journals of Springer. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Should I inquire the journal about the exact status? Your advice would be appreciated. ” When sent for peer review, phrases such as “reviewers invited” It is normal, you are now entering the stage that takes an unfortunately unknown period of time: the search for reviewers. Then, it changed back to "Reviewers Assigned". For 3 days, the status of my manuscript remained ‘Editor Assigned’ and then changed to ‘Under Review’. What does it mean? Meaning of the Editor Assigned status for the third time after 2 months of under review I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience I submitted a manuscript to Springer Journal. On 21st July, the status changed to 'Editor Assigned. Why is it taking such a long time with the editor? I have The status “Editor Assigned” means that your paper was assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who would be responsible for your manuscript till the first decision. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or not? Usually, the “Editor Assigned” The reviews have been completed and the system administrator or the journal manager assigned the editor (who is assumed to be associated with it earlier) to take care of So, your re-revised manuscript has moved to Editor Assigned after Under Review. Since 10 days, the online tracking system has been showing "reviewers assigned" as the current status. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Both reviewers asked me to add more literature and enhance the figures' quality. What does it mean? My manuscript has still not been sent for peer review. It is slightly concerning that an editor would be invited after 8 months of submission. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Since last one month, the online tracking system has been showing "reviewers assigned" as the current status. "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. Then I re-submitted the revised form. I have submitted a Manuscript to a springer journal about 4 month ago. What is known is that “Environment, Development and Sustainability” So, the editor may have invited a new reviewer (s) (hence, the status is reviewer assigned). "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. How much time will it take as one month is already over. After two months of submission, I received a decision for major revision. It was still "Reviewer assigned" as per the last updated status on 31st August. " What does this mean? Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Currently, the status of my manuscript has been ‘Editor Assigned’ and it has been showing the same status for one month. “required reviews completed,” “with editor,” or “decision in process. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal and the status has been “Editor Assigned” for 5 weeks. Now, again it I've submitted my paper to a Springer journal. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. A week before status date only updated but current status remains same. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. For the next two days, reviewers were assigned and then the status again changed to under review for 10 days, and then finally to "required reviews completed". The status "required reviews completed" was shown I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. I have come across some Springer journals that use "Under review" to refer to the initial admin check before the Associate Editor (AE) is assigned. After two months the rest of the journal decided to invite a new editor, causing the status to move back to "editor invited". After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". What could be the possible reason for such a change? Does this mean, I have to wait at least another four months to get a first decision? My manuscript had an Editor Assigned status for the 3rd time after 2 month under review and a reviewer assigned status 2nd time. I submitted a paper for Springer Journal and it said "editor invited," then after one month it said "editor assigned," and now it says “Under Review". But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. Respected Sir/Mam, I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review I submitted the manuscript to a Springer medical journal. Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I sent a manuscript to Springer, in status it appears "Under Review", it means that it has already been approved by the editor and has gone through peer review? Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. The various status Note that this might be the case for journals besides those published by Springer as well. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to Recently, I submitted my manuscript after major revisions to a Springer journal. I’m not sure whether this status is because the Springer journal does not use the status “Under review,” or because just the process is delayed. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. . One day later, the status changed as "editor assigned". If the status changed to "under review" directly after submission without showing any other status before it, your paper was probably under the internal admin check and not Q: What does a change to Editor Assigned mean after the completion of reviews for a major revision? I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. The status of my paper I submitted my manuscript on Oct 5 in a Springer Psychology journal. They have given a major revision decision twice. Some journals might use "reviewers" assigned" to mean "under review. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. initial about 1 month, the online tracking system has been showing "with Editor" as the current status. Subsequently, the date of the status changed to 13th July while the I submitted my manuscript to a journal. After subsequent changes in the status, finally it showed “Reviews completed” on 5th of July. I couldn't understand what it means: is it under review or not? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. When the new reviewer (s) accepts the invitation then status will change back to "Under review". One month later, major revision was suggested. After 10 days, the status changed to "Editor Assigned". For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal on 14th August and the status changed to "Reviewer assigned" on 20th August. The status turned to "Under Review" after two weeks and remained the same for four months. ” I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Some journals also use the "Under review" status when the manuscript is under the initial editorial screening and use "reviewers assigned" or "reviewers invited" to indicate that your paper has been I submitted a paper to a Springer-based journal on 1st July, 2020. " I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. We have answered similar queries before; you might find the answers useful: What does "Editor assigned" mean after "Under review" for a revised manuscript? How long does it take for the status to change from "reviewers assigned" to "under review"? I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. After passing the initial check, it stayed with the "Reviewers Assigned" status until 12 Oct and went Under Review on 13 Oct. Now status After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Through a letter to the editor, I sent the updated manuscript addressing all the The status "Editor invited" means that an Associate Editor(AE) has been invited for your paper. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. ' I understand that this is the initial screening. I sent an email to the handling editor. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week. After incorporating the comments of reviewers, I resubmitted the paper. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and been given to the external reviewer? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. However, the Under Review status changed to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 17 and again to Reviewers Assigned on Oct 19. Could you possibly tell me how long I should wait for that status before sending a reminder mail. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted a manuscript in a Springer journal Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing on October 10, 2017. One possibility is that the "under review" status referred to the initial admin check post which a manuscript is assigned to an editor. Is this status indicative of a desk rejection? The most probable explanation is that the assigned editor is inactive and did not invite reviewers (which would also explain why you never saw the status change to "under review"). But now it's been more than a month and this status is not changing. Did anyone encounter the same I submitted an article to springer. After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. I had submitted a review article in one of the springer journals one year ago and the status form 11 months was "Reviewers assigned" but the date was changing every 10-12 daysone week ago sent I had submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 29th may 2019. mdhkooa xtyxjh whwge weo vgijay znniy lqrzyzq iygukvo fso gll